Mechanisms of Dyspnea Relief During Exercise in COPD Patients Following Treatment With Tiotropium (Spiriva)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To explore the mechanisms of dyspnea relief during exercise in patients with COPD following treatment with tiotropium bromide (Spiriva)
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
Drug: tiotropium bromide |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Double-Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Study to Examine the Effects of Tiotropium on Lung Hyperinflation, Respiratory Mechanics and Dyspnea During Exercise in Patients With COPD |
- Borg dyspnea rating at a standardized exercise time during a constant work rate exercise challenge to symptom limitation at 75% maximal work capacity
- Pulmonary Function Testing; Static Lung Compliance; Frequency Dependence of Dynamic Compliance; Inspiratory Capacity; Flow-Volume Loop Analysis; Exercise Lung Mechanics
| Estimated Enrollment: | 30 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2001 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | March 2003 |
This was a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. The duration of subject participation was 9 weeks. There was an initial screening period of up to 2 weeks. The first screening visit consisted of medical history, clinical assessment, chronic dyspnea evaluation, complete pulmonary function testing, and a symptom-limited maximal incremental cycle exercise test. A second visit during the screening period was intended as a training of the subject to the procedures to be performed in the study, with specific focus on familiarisation with the constant work rate exercise test. The screening period was followed by 2 x 7 day treatment periods (1 x tiotropium and 1 x placebo), separated by a 4 week washout period. On the last day of each treatment period, the subject visited the clinic to complete a series of trial related procedures, including lung function measurements and a constant work rate exercise test at 75% Wcap to symptom limitation. Testing consisted of pulmonary function testing, dyspnea evaluation, and symptom-limited constant-load cycle exercise tests with measurements of cardiopulmonary parameters, symptom intensity and pulmonary mechanics. \
Study Hypothesis:
Dynamic hyperinflation restricts volume expansion during exercise and is suspected as a primary mechanism of dyspnea. The dissociation between drive or muscular effort to breathe and the mechanical response to increased volume (as reflected by an increased Pes/PImax: VT/predicted VC ratio) correlates well with the intensity of inspiratory difficulty during exercise in COPD. It was hypothesised that reduced Borg ratings at a standardized exercise level after tiotropium would correlate strongly with reduced restricted volume expansion during exercise (i.e., increased VT/IC and EILV/TLC ratios, and decreased IC and IRV). In other words, dyspnea and its predominant qualitative dimensions (i.e., inspiratory difficulty) result from patients being forced by DH to breathe at a high lung volume, at or above predicted TLC.
Comparison(s):
tiotropium bromide (Spiriva) vs. placebo
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 40 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion criteria: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with FEV1 < 70% predicted and FRC > 120% predicted, a cigarette smoking history > 20 pack-years, and moderate to severe chronic dyspnea
Exclusion criteria: patients with a history of asthma, allergic rhinitis or atopy; patients who participated in a rehabilitation program for COPD within 6 weeks prior to screening
Contacts and Locations| Canada, Ontario | |
| Kingston General Hospital | |
| Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 2V6 | |
| Study Chair: | Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator | B.I. Canada Ltd. |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00274027 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 205.231 |
| Study First Received: | January 9, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | May 11, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Health Canada (TPD) |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Chronic Disease Lung Diseases Respiration Disorders Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes Respiratory Tract Diseases Lung Diseases, Obstructive Bromides Tiotropium Anticonvulsants Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses |
Pharmacologic Actions Parasympatholytics Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Cholinergic Antagonists Cholinergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Bronchodilator Agents Anti-Asthmatic Agents Respiratory System Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013