Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO) (GALILEO)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Bayer
Collaborator:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Information provided by:
Bayer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01012973
First received: October 30, 2009
Last updated: January 18, 2013
Last verified: January 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: October 23, 2012
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Retinal Vein Occlusion |
| Interventions: |
Biological: Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) Other: Sham treatment |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept Injection | Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20, later as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Follow-up phase: Participants on IAI, who continued the study, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
| Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection | Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 52. Follow-up phase: Participants on sham treatment, who switched to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI), received a 2 mg dose of IAI at week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| Aflibercept Injection First, Then Aflibercept Injection | Sham Treatment First, Then Aflibercept Injection | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 106 | 71 |
| Participants Received Treatment | 104 [1] | 68 [1] |
| Fulfilled Requirements of FAS Population | 103 [2] | 68 [2] |
| Completed Week 24, From FAS | 97 | 57 |
| Completed Week 52, From FAS | 91 | 52 |
| COMPLETED | 90 | 52 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 16 | 19 |
| Adverse Event | 5 | 5 |
| Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 5 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| (Overseas travel - indefinite period) | 1 | 0 |
| Increase in vis. acuity, never injected | 0 | 1 |
| Protocol Violation | 5 | 2 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 6 |
| [1] | Safety Population: Participants received treatment |
|---|---|
| [2] | Full Analysis Set (FAS) Population: Participants received treatment with post baseline measurements |
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) | Participants received a 2 mg dose of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 20, later as often as every 4 weeks depending on the study retreatment criteria from Week 24 through Week 48. Follow-up phase: Participants on IAI, who continued the study, received 2 mg dose of IAI depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
| Sham Treatment | Participants received sham treatment administered every 4 weeks from Day 1 through Week 52. Follow-up phase: Participants on sham treatment, who switched to Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI), received a 2 mg dose of IAI at week 52 and depending on the study retreatment criteria at Week 60 and 68. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| Aflibercept Injection (EYLEA, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) | Sham Treatment | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
104 | 68 | 172 |
|
Age
[units: Years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
60.0 ± 12.3 | 63.8 ± 13.3 | 61.5 ± 12.8 |
|
Gender
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Female | 45 | 31 | 76 |
| Male | 59 | 37 | 96 |
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Hispanic or Latino | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 100 | 66 | 166 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
Baseline Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letter scores
[1] [units: Letters correctly read] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
53.5 ± 15.7 | 50.9 ± 15.4 | 52.5 ± 15.6 |
|
Number of participants with baseline retinal perfusion
[2] [units: Participants] |
|||
| Perfused | 90 | 54 | 144 |
| Nonperfused | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| Indeterminate | 7 | 7 | 14 |
|
Baseline Retinal Thickness by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
[units: microns] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
682.78 ± 233.36 | 638.66 ± 224.69 | 665.34 ± 230.33 |
|
Baseline intraocular pressure
[units: mm Hg] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
15.2 ± 2.8 | 14.4 ± 2.7 | 14.9 ± 2.8 |
|
Number of participants with time since Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) diagnosis
[units: Participants] |
|||
| >= 2 months | 46 | 33 | 79 |
| < 2 months | 56 | 35 | 91 |
| Missing | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
Baseline National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) total score
[3] [units: scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
79.66 ± 13.06 | 78.94 ± 14.00 | 79.38 ± 13.40 |
|
European questionnaire 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) total score
[4] [units: score on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
0.87 ± 0.15 | 0.86 ± 0.16 | 0.87 ± 0.15 |
|
Race
[units: Participants] |
|||
| Asian | 26 | 15 | 41 |
| White | 75 | 49 | 124 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| [1] | Infiormation retrieved from all baseline participants. Only participants with a ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) Best Corrected Visual Acuity letter score of 73 to 25 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye at 4 meters were included; a higher score represents better functioning. |
|---|---|
| [2] | Retinal perfusion defined as less than 10 disc areas of capillary nonperfusion using fluorescein angiography (FA) |
| [3] | The NEI VFQ-25 total score ranges from 0-100 with a score of 0 being the worst outcome and 100 being the best outcome. The NEI VFQ questionnaire is organized as a collection of subscales which are all scored from 0-100. To reach the overall composite score, each sub-scale score is averaged in order to give each sub-scale equal weight. |
| [4] | The EQ-5D total score ranges from -0.594 to 1.000 with -0.594 being the worst. |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in BCVA as Measured by ETDRS Letter Score Compared With Baseline at Week 24 With Discontinued Participants Before Week 24 Evaluated as Failures [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in BCVA as Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score at Week 24 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ] |
| 3. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Week 24 - LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Percentage of Participants Who Developed Neovascularization During the First 24 Weeks [ Time Frame: From baseline until Week 24 ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Total Score at Week 24 - LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Change From Baseline in European Five-dimensional Health Scale (EQ-5D) Score at Week 24 - LOCF [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Therapeutic Area Head
Organization: BAYER
e-mail: clinical-trials-contact@bayerhealthcare.com
Organization: BAYER
e-mail: clinical-trials-contact@bayerhealthcare.com
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Therapeutic Area Head, Bayer HealthCare AG |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01012973 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 14130, 2009-010973-19 |
| Study First Received: | October 30, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | October 23, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | January 18, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration Austria: Agency for Health and Food Safety France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) Hungary: National Institute of Pharmacy Italy: Ministry of Health Latvia: State Agency of Medicines Japan: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Singapore: Health Sciences Authority South Korea: Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) |