Gel-200 Extension and Open-Label Study in Osteoarthritis of the Knee
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Seikagaku Corporation
Information provided by:
Seikagaku Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00450112
First received: March 20, 2007
Last updated: July 25, 2011
Last verified: July 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Results First Received: April 15, 2011
| Study Type: | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized; Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study; Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment; Masking: Open Label; Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Condition: |
Osteoarthritis of the Knee |
| Intervention: |
Device: Gel-200 |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details
| Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Pre-Assignment Details
| Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment |
|---|
| A total of 202 patients were entered. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| 2Gel-200 | Patients already received 1 single dose of Gel-200 (3 mL) and followed up for 13 weeks in previous study(NCT00449696). After completion of previous study, patients entered this study and received 1 single dose of Gel-200 (3mL) intra-articular injection again into knee joint. |
| 1PBS1Gel-200 | Patients already received 1 single dose of Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) placebo (3 mL) and followed up for 13 weeks in previous study (NCT00449696). After completion of previous study, patients entered this study and received 1 single dose of Gel-200 (3mL) intra-articular injection into knee joint. |
Participant Flow: Overall Study
| 2Gel-200 | 1PBS1Gel-200 | |
|---|---|---|
| STARTED | 125 | 77 |
| Received Injection | 125 | 74 |
| Analyzed Participants | 122 [1] | 74 |
| COMPLETED | 112 | 71 |
| NOT COMPLETED | 13 | 6 |
| Other Treatment Required | 5 | 1 |
| Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 1 |
| Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 1 |
| Others | 2 | 3 |
| [1] | 3 subjects removed from ITT analyses because of no post treatment data (pre-defined criteria). |
|---|
Baseline Characteristics
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| 2Gel-200 | Patients already received 1 single dose of Gel-200 (3 mL) and followed up for 13 weeks in previous study(NCT00449696). After completion of previous study, patients entered this study and received 1 single dose of Gel-200 (3mL) intra-articular injection again into knee joint. |
| 1PBS1Gel-200 | Patients already received 1 single dose of Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) placebo (3 mL) and followed up for 13 weeks in previous study (NCT00449696). After completion of previous study, patients entered this study and received 1 single dose of Gel-200 (3mL) intra-articular injection into knee joint. |
| Total | Total of all reporting groups |
Baseline Measures
| 2Gel-200 | 1PBS1Gel-200 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants
[units: participants] |
122 | 74 | 196 |
|
Age
[units: years] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
61.4 ± 10.29 | 61.6 ± 10.50 | 61.4 ± 10.35 |
|
Gender
[units: participants] |
|||
| Female | 74 | 48 | 122 |
| Male | 48 | 26 | 74 |
|
Region of Enrollment
[units: participants] |
|||
| United States | 122 | 74 | 196 |
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
[units: kilograms/meters square] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
28.6 ± 4.14 | 29.1 ± 4.01 | 28.8 ± 4.09 |
|
WOMAC VAS Pain Subscore
[1] [units: Scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
69.4 ± 15.82 | 69.9 ± 15.13 | 69.5 ± 15.53 |
|
WOMAC VAS Stiffness Subscore
[2] [units: scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
69.7 ± 18.31 | 70.7 ± 18.40 | 70.1 ± 18.30 |
|
WOMAC VAS Physical Function Subcore
[3] [units: scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
68.0 ± 17.96 | 69.9 ± 16.35 | 68.7 ± 17.35 |
|
WOMAC VAS Total Score
[4] [units: scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
68.4 ± 17.07 | 69.9 ± 15.79 | 69.0 ± 16.58 |
|
Subject Global Evaluations
[5] [units: scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
66.1 ± 21.81 | 68.2 ± 18.85 | 66.9 ± 20.70 |
|
Physician Global Evaluations
[6] [units: scores on a scale] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
60.5 ± 16.85 | 62.6 ± 20.51 | 61.3 ± 18.29 |
| [1] | Assessed Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain subscores on VAS of 100 mm.; 0 mm meaning no pain; 100 mm meaning extreme pain. |
|---|---|
| [2] | Assessed Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) stiffness subscores on VAS of 100 mm.; 0 mm meaning no stiffness; 100 mm meaning extreme stiffness. |
| [3] | Assessed Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) physical function subscores on VAS of 100 mm.; 0 mm meaning no difficulty; 100 mm meaning extreme difficulty. |
| [4] | Mean of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, stiffness and physical function subscores on VAS of 100 mm.; 0 mm meaning no pain, stiffness and difficulty; 100 mm meaning extreme pain, stiffness and difficulty. |
| [5] | Observed subject evaluations on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 100 mm.; 0 mm meaning excellent feeling in knee joint; 100 mm meaning poor feeling in knee joint. |
| [6] | Observed physician evaluations on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 100 mm.; 0 mm meaning excellent feeling in knee joint; 100 mm meaning poor feeling in knee joint. |
Outcome Measures
| 1. Primary: | Occurrence of Systemic and Local Adverse Events Following a Single or Repeat Intra-articular Injection of Gel-200 [ Time Frame: 13 weeks ] |
| 2. Secondary: | Improvement From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Pain Subscore) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13 ] |
Hide Outcome Measure 2| Measure Type | Secondary |
|---|---|
| Measure Title | Improvement From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Pain Subscore) |
| Measure Description | Observed WOMAC pain subscore on VAS of 100 mm.; 0 mm meaning no pain; 100 mm meaning extreme pain. Improved score from baseline to week 13 were calculated as baseline minus week 13. |
| Time Frame | Baseline and Week 13 |
| Safety Issue | No |
Population Description
| Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate. |
|---|
| ITT population was used for analysis. 3 patients with 2Gel-200 were removed from ITT population analysis and baseline because of no post treatment data according to a pre-specified rule. These data were submitted to FDA. |
Reporting Groups
| Description | |
|---|---|
| 2Gel-200 | Patients already received 1 single dose of Gel-200 (3 mL) and followed up for 13 weeks in previous study(NCT00449696). After completion of previous study, patients entered this study and received 1 single dose of Gel-200 (3mL) intra-articular injection again into knee joint. |
| 1PBS1Gel-200 | Patients already received 1 single dose of Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) placebo (3 mL) and followed up for 13 weeks in previous study (NCT00449696). After completion of previous study, patients entered this study and received 1 single dose of Gel-200 (3mL) intra-articular injection into knee joint. |
Measured Values
| 2Gel-200 | 1PBS1Gel-200 | |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Analyzed
[units: participants] |
122 | 74 |
|
Improvement From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Pain Subscore)
[units: millimeters] Mean ± Standard Deviation |
32.3 ± 22.68 | 35.4 ± 22.97 |
Statistical Analysis 1 for Improvement From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Pain Subscore)
| Groups [1] | 2Gel-200 |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | t-test, 2 sided |
| P Value [3] | <0.0001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| One-sample 2 sided t-test of change from baseline within 2Gel-200 group; no between-group test was performed. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
Statistical Analysis 2 for Improvement From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Pain Subscore)
| Groups [1] | 1PBS1Gel-200 |
|---|---|
| Method [2] | t-test, 2 sided |
| P Value [3] | <0.0001 |
| [1] | Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation: |
|---|---|
| One-sample 2 sided t-test of change from baseline within 1PBS1Gel-200 group; no between-group test was performed. | |
| [2] | Other relevant information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom: |
| No text entered. | |
| [3] | Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance: |
| No text entered. |
| 3. Secondary: | Improvement From Baseline in WOMAC VAS (Stiffness Subscore) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13 ] |
| 4. Secondary: | Improvement From Baseline in WOMAC VAS (Physical Function Subscore) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13 ] |
| 5. Secondary: | Improvement From Baseline in WOMAC VAS (Total Score) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13 ] |
| 6. Secondary: | Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Artthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) - and the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Response [ Time Frame: Weeks 13 ] |
| 7. Secondary: | Improvement From Baseline in Subject Global Evaluations [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13 ] |
| 8. Secondary: | Improvement From Baseline in Physician Global Evaluations [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 13 ] |
| 9. Secondary: | Acetaminophen Consumption [ Time Frame: Week 9 to Week 13 ] |
More Information
Certain Agreements:
Limitations and Caveats
Results Point of Contact:
No publications provided
| Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study. | ||||||
| There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. | ||||||
The agreement is:
|
Limitations and Caveats
| Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data |
|---|
| No text entered. |
Results Point of Contact:
Name/Title: Clinical Development Dept.
Organization: Seikagaku Corporation
phone: 81-3-5220-8950
e-mail: hiroyuki.hosokawa@seikagaku.co.jp
Organization: Seikagaku Corporation
phone: 81-3-5220-8950
e-mail: hiroyuki.hosokawa@seikagaku.co.jp
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Osamu Akahane, Seikagaku Corporation |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00450112 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Gel/1132 |
| Study First Received: | March 20, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | April 15, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | July 25, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |