Comparison of Synchrony Between 4 NIV Ventilators

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Prof. Philippe Jolliet, University of Lausanne Hospitals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01615432
First received: June 6, 2012
Last updated: May 15, 2013
Last verified: May 2013

June 6, 2012
May 15, 2013
June 2012
November 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Patient-ventilator synchrony [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Patient-ventilator synchrony will be assessed breath by brath on the basis of airway pressure, flow and diaphragmatic electrical activity recordings.
Patient-ventilator synchrony [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01615432 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • comfort of patient under NIV [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Patient's confort during NIV will be assessed using a visual analogic scale.
  • Ventilatory parameters [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Tidal volume, respiratory rate, inspiratory time, expiratory time and maximal and mean airway pressure will be measured from the continuous recording of airway pressure and flow.
  • comfort of patient under NIV [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • ventilatory parameters [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Comparison of Synchrony Between 4 NIV Ventilators
Comparison of Four Different Ventilators for Noninvasive Ventilation in Terms of Patient-ventilator Synchrony and Comfort

Comparison of the effects of 4 ventilators dedicated to NIV (2 home ventilators and 2 ventilators designed for NIV) on patient-ventilator synchrony and comfort in patients admitted in the intensive care unit for respiratory failure and treated with NIV.

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Respiratoy Failure Requiring NIV Treatment
  • Device: V-PAP III ventilator
  • Device: Stellar 150 ventilator
  • Device: BiPAP vision ventilator
  • Device: V60 ventilator
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
22
April 2013
November 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • respiratory failure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe hypoxemia requiring an FiO2 > 0.6
  • Hemodynamic instability : defined as a variation of > 20% in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) during the previous 2 hours; the need for high doses of catecholamines (namely > 0.5 mcg/kg/min) and/or the need of major volume resuscitation (more than 2 liters of fluids in 2 hours)
  • Impaired consciousness or absence of patient cooperation;
  • Facial or laryngeal lesions contraindicating the use of NIV;
  • Poor short term prognosis.
  • Age < 18 years old
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Switzerland
 
NCT01615432
Synchro_Non invasive vent
No
Prof. Philippe Jolliet, University of Lausanne Hospitals
University of Lausanne Hospitals
Not Provided
Not Provided
University of Lausanne Hospitals
May 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP