Assessment of Stent Malapposition and Neointimal Coverage on Optical coHerence Tomography at Post-procedure and 3 Months After Platinum Chromium Alloy Of the Element™ Stent Implantation (ANCHOR)

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified April 2012 by Yonsei University
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Myeong-Ki Hong, Yonsei University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01581515
First received: April 11, 2012
Last updated: April 17, 2012
Last verified: April 2012

April 11, 2012
April 17, 2012
January 2012
January 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
the ratio of the malapposed strut [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed from first OCT invervention to 3month OCT following intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The ratio of the malapposed strut, on an immediate OCT after nominal stent pressure and at a final post-procedure between two different DES; ANCHOR-I
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01581515 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Incidence of stent malapposition [ Time Frame: 3months OCT following intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Neointimal coverage(ANCHOR II) [ Time Frame: 3 month-OCT after stent implantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Incidence of plaque prolapse [ Time Frame: final postprocedural OCT ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Evaluation of stent expansion [ Time Frame: an immediate and post-procedural OCT ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Stent malapposition [ Time Frame: on 3 month OCT intervention ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Assessment of Stent Malapposition and Neointimal Coverage on Optical coHerence Tomography at Post-procedure and 3 Months After Platinum Chromium Alloy Of the Element™ Stent Implantation
2-phased Randomized Comparison Between PromusTMElementTM Versus Xience PRIME® Stent

The purpose of this study is to compare the degree of stent malapposition on an immediate optical coherence tomography (OCT) after nominal stent pressure and at a final post-procedure OCT (ANCHOR-I) and the neointimal coverage on 3-months OCT following the intervention with the randomly assigned two drug-eluting stents (DES), PromusTMElementTM stents versus Xience PRIME® stents.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Coronary Artery Disease
  • Device: Promus Element everolimus eluting coronary stent
    Patients with native coronary arteries fulfilling all enrollment criteria will be randomly assigned to each DES group; either Promus Element or Xience Prime
  • Device: Xience Prime everolimus eluting coronary stent
    Patients with native coronary arteries fulfilling all enrollment criteria will be randomly assigned to each DES group; either Promus Element or Xience Prime
  • Active Comparator: P-E group
    Patients with native coronary arteries fulfilling all enrollment criteria will be randomly assigned to each DES group; either Promus Element or Xience Prime
    Intervention: Device: Promus Element everolimus eluting coronary stent
  • Active Comparator: X-P group
    Patients with native coronary arteries fulfilling all enrollment criteria will be randomly assigned to each DES group; either Promus Element or Xience Prime
    Intervention: Device: Xience Prime everolimus eluting coronary stent
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
100
January 2014
January 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is ≥ 20 years old
  • Significant coronary de novo lesion (> 70% by quantitative angiographic analysis) treated by single DES in each vessel.
  • Patients with stable angina who are considered for coronary revascularization with stent implantation.
  • Reference vessel diameter of 2.5 to 3.5 mm by operator assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complex lesion morphologies such as aorto-ostial, unprotected left main, chronic total occlusion, graft, thrombosis, and restenosis
  • Reference vessel diameter < 2.5 mm or > 4.0mm and lesion length > 28 mm
  • Heavy calcified lesions (definite calcified lesions on angiogram)
  • Lesions requiring more than 2 DES in each vessel
  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Contraindication to anti-platelet agents
  • Treated with any DES within 3 months at other vessel
  • Creatinine level ≥ 2.0 mg/dL or ESRD
  • Severe hepatic dysfunction (3 times normal reference values)
  • Pregnant women or women with potential childbearing
  • Life expectancy 1 year
Both
20 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact: Myeong-Ki Hong, MD.PhD. +82 2 2228 8458 mkhong61@yuhs.ac
Korea, Republic of
 
NCT01581515
1-2011-0080
Yes
Myeong-Ki Hong, Yonsei University
Yonsei University
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Myeong-Ki Hong, MD.PhD. Severance Hospital
Yonsei University
April 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP