Evaluation of a Mixed Bowel Prep (2L PEG + Bisacodyl) Versus PEG With Ascorbate

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Promefarm S.r.l.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01509131
First received: January 4, 2012
Last updated: January 11, 2012
Last verified: January 2012

January 4, 2012
January 11, 2012
March 2010
December 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Evaluation of the quality of bowel preparation by BBPS [ Time Frame: 20 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
BBPS is an established rating scale to evaluate the quality of bowel preparation. A score greater than 6 is considered as success. The rate of success will be compared between the two groups.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01509131 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Difference in mucosal visibility between the two groups [ Time Frame: 20 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Three point rating scale(0-2).
  • Number of patients with adverse events [ Time Frame: 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    Patient questioning.
  • Difference in tolerability between the two groups [ Time Frame: 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Difference in the percentage of patients in the two groups who developed GI symptoms related to bowel preparation.
  • Difference in patients acceptability between the two groups [ Time Frame: 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Difference in the percentage of patients in the two groups who were willing to repeat the preparation and easy to take the bowel preparation.
  • Difference in patients compliance between the two groups [ Time Frame: 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Difference in the percentage of patients who took at least 75% of bowel preparation.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Evaluation of a Mixed Bowel Prep (2L PEG + Bisacodyl) Versus PEG With Ascorbate
Low Volume Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: a Comparison Between PEG-CS Plus Bisacodyl Versus PEG-ASC

It is hypothesized that PEG 2L with citrate and simeticone plus bisacodyl will have similar bowel cleansing efficacy versus PEG 2L with ascorbate. Safety, tolerability, acceptance and compliance of the two reduced volume PEG-based bowel preparation will be also compared.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Colonoscopy
  • Drug: 2L PEG-CS plus bisacodyl
    Patients will be asked to take 2L of Lovolesse and bisacodyl (10-20 mg according to patient bowel habit)
    Other Name: Lovolesse 2L plus Lovoldyl 5 mg (2-4 tablets)
  • Drug: 2L PEG-ASC
    Patients will asked to take PEG-ASC according to labeling instructions
    Other Name: Moviprep
  • Experimental: 2L PEG-CS plus bisacodyl
    Patients will be asked to take 2L PEG-CS plus bisacodyl (10-20 mg according to patient bowel habit)
    Intervention: Drug: 2L PEG-CS plus bisacodyl
  • Active Comparator: 2L PEG-ASC
    Patients will be asked to take PEG-ASC according to labeling instructions
    Intervention: Drug: 2L PEG-ASC
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
408
December 2010
December 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Out-patients undergoing a complete colonoscopy
  • Patient written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women or at a risk of becoming pregnant
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients
  • History of anaphylaxis to drugs or allergic reactions in general
  • Known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation
  • Toxic megacolon; major colonic resection
  • Heart failure (Class III or IV); severe renal failure; relevant diseases, that may interfere with the aim of the study
  • Phenylketonuria;Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
  • Unwillingness to co-operate and to comply with the requirements of the trial
Both
18 Years to 85 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Italy
 
NCT01509131
PMF105BC1/09
No
Promefarm S.r.l.
Promefarm S.r.l.
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Alessandro Repici, MD IRCSS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano (MI) - Italy
Principal Investigator: Renzo Cestari, Prof. MD Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia - Italy
Principal Investigator: Cesare Hassan, MD Nuovo Regina Margherita, Roma - Italy
Principal Investigator: Angelo Andriulli, MD IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo - Italy
Principal Investigator: Vito Annese, MD Ospedale Careggi, Firenze - Italy
Promefarm S.r.l.
January 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP