Comparison of Two Treatments for Strabismus Correction: Botulinum Toxin A Associated to Surgery and Surgery Alone

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Nilza Minguini, University of Campinas, Brazil
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01460355
First received: October 16, 2011
Last updated: October 25, 2011
Last verified: October 2011

October 16, 2011
October 25, 2011
September 2006
June 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
percentage of decrease of the initial angle of strabismus [ Time Frame: 6 to 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The percentages of decrease of the initial angle of strabismus were accessed by subtracting the final deviation of the initial deviation, dividing the result by the initial deviation and multiplying it by 100.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01460355 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
frequency of induced blepharoptosis [ Time Frame: From the first to the last post operative day of follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The presence of induced blepharoptosis was detected by simple inspection and was reported as positive or negative.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Comparison of Two Treatments for Strabismus Correction: Botulinum Toxin A Associated to Surgery and Surgery Alone
Surgery Associated to Intraoperative Botulinum Toxin A for Large Angle Horizontal Strabismus: a Pilot Study

Two different treatments were given to large angle horizontal strabismus (eso and exotropia) adult patients who agree to participate of the study. Inform consents were required for participants. Group 1 (12 patients) received conventional recess-resect surgery plus intraoperative injection of botulinum toxin A (5U). Group 2 (11 patients) received only conventional recess-resect surgery. The patients were randomly located in one of the groups. The angles of horizontal deviation were compared between the groups before and six months after treatment.

Patients underwent recess/resection surgery on the non-fixating eye using conventional technique under local anesthesia. The extent of surgery was determined based on our usual amounts. Before re-attaching the recessed muscle to the sclera, 5 units of botulinum toxin in 0.1 ml of hyaline solution were, or 0.1 ml of hyaline solution alone were was injected into the posterior muscle belly by the surgeon who was unaware of the contents of each syringe.

Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Esotropia
  • Exotropia
  • Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type A
    injection of 5U in 0.1ml of saline solution will be given to the recessed muscle
    Other Name: BTA
  • Drug: saline solution
    injection of 0,1ml of saline solution will be given to the recessed muscle
    Other Name: saline
  • Active Comparator: Botulinum toxin plus surgery
    Intraoperative injection of 5U (0.1 ml) of Botulinum Toxin will be given to the recessed muscle during surgery
    Intervention: Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type A
  • Placebo Comparator: Saline solution plus surgery
    Saline solution (0,1 ml)will be given to the recessed muscle during surgery procedure
    Intervention: Drug: saline solution

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
23
June 2008
June 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults with large angle horizontal strabismus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • oblique muscle disfunction
  • previous strabismus surgery
  • dissociated vertical deviation
  • paretic or restrictive deviation
Both
20 Years to 60 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Brazil
 
NCT01460355
Unicamp-CEP- 427/2006
No
Nilza Minguini, University of Campinas, Brazil
University of Campinas, Brazil
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Nilza Minguini, MD, PhD University of Campinas, Brazil
University of Campinas, Brazil
October 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP