Right Ventricular (RV) Pacing in Early Post-operative Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD)

This study has been terminated.
(Recruitment futility)
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Medtronic
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Duke University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01446796
First received: September 14, 2011
Last updated: November 28, 2012
Last verified: November 2012

September 14, 2011
November 28, 2012
September 2011
May 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Length of hospitalization [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
To determine whether continuous RV pacing reduces ICU length of stay (# days) and overall hospital length of stay (# days) post-LVAD implantation.
Length of hospitalization [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
To determine whether continuous RV pacing reduces ICU length of stay (# days) and overall hospital legnth of stay (# days) post-LVAD implantation.
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01446796 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Post-operative need for hemodynamic / respiratory support [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    To determine whether continuous RV pacing reduces the need for inotropic / vasoactive agents, mechanical ventilation, or other circulatory support in the early post-operative period. Measured by the number of hemodynamic and respiratory support interventions and duration of those interventions.
  • Right ventricular function [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    To determine whether continuous RV pacing improves invasive and non-invasive measures of RV function in the early period post-LVAD implantation. Measured by Pulmonary Artery catheter measures of intra-cardiac pressures and cardiac output in the ICU setting and by qualitative and quantitative Echocardiographic measures of RV function during the hospital course.
  • Functional capacity and symptoms [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    To determine whether continuous RV pacing improves functional capacity and symptoms as measured by six minute walk test and symptoms questionnaires in the early post-LVAD implantation period.
  • Post-operative need for hemodynamic / respiratory support [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    To determine whether continuous RV pacing reduces the need for inotropic / vasoactive agents, mechanical ventilation, or other circulatory support in the early post-operative period. Measured by the number of hemodynamic and respiratory support interventions and duration of those interventions.
  • Right ventricular function [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    To determine whether continuous RV pacing improves invasive and non-invasive measures of RV function in the early period post-LVAD implantation. Measured by PA catheter measures of intra-cardiac pressures and cardiac output in the ICU setting and by qualitative and quantitative Echocardiographic measures of RV function during the hospital course.
  • Functional capacity and symptoms [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    To determine whether continuous RV pacing improves functional capacity and symptoms as measured by six minute walk test and symptoms questionnaires in the early post-LVAD implantation period.
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Right Ventricular (RV) Pacing in Early Post-operative Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD)
Hemodynamic and Clinical Effects of Continuous Right Ventricular Pacing in the Early Post-operative Period After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Continuous right ventricular (RV) pacing demonstrates harm in patients with normal left ventricular (LV) function as well as in patients with cardiomyopathy and clinical heart failure. However, little is known about RV pacing in patients with advanced heart failure treated with an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The univentricular support provided by contemporary continuous flow LVAD's has improved outcomes for many advanced heart failure patients, yet the incidence of RV failure in the early post-operative period following implantation is associated with significantly reduced survival and increased length of stay. Acute LVAD unloading of the left ventricle has adverse effects on RV shape and size that contribute to post-operative RV failure. By promoting RV synchrony, RV overdrive pacing may counteract these adverse mechanical alterations, improving RV systolic function and ultimately LVAD function.

The investigators will recruit all patients referred for an implantable, continuous flow LVAD at Duke University Medical Center who have an existing implantable dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator. Patients will be prospectively randomized into two cohorts to compare continuous right ventricular pacing vs. native ventricular conduction at equivalent heart rates. Multiple clinical outcomes will be examined over a two week period post-operatively including invasive hemodynamics, vasoactive medication use, end-organ function, RV function by Echocardiography as well as patient symptoms and functional status.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Subject)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Heart Failure
  • Device: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (subject's pre-existing ICD)
    Pacing parameters set to AAI 90
  • Device: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (subject's pre-existing ICD)
    Pacing parameters set to DDD 90-100
  • Placebo Comparator: Native Conduction
    Devices will be programmed to continuous atrial pacing at an AAI (atrial inhibited pacing) setting with base rate 90 bpm. Patients will not receive ventricular pacing.
    Intervention: Device: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (subject's pre-existing ICD)
  • Experimental: Continuous RV Pacing
    Devices will be programmed to continuous dual chamber pacing at a DDD (dual chamber dual pacing) setting with base rate ≥ 90 bpm (not to exceed 100 bpm) to achieve a majority (>80%) of paced right ventricular beats
    Intervention: Device: Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (subject's pre-existing ICD)
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Terminated
3
October 2012
May 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old, both men and women
  • Existing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)
  • Referred for implantation of a continuous flow LVAD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Permanent left ventricular epicardial defibrillator in place
  • Congenital heart disease with single ventricle physiology
  • Right ventricular assist device (RVAD) in place
  • Existing pacing indication
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT01446796
Pro00026676
Yes
Duke University
Duke University
Medtronic
Principal Investigator: Joseph Rogers, MD Duke University
Duke University
November 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP