Chlorine Dioxide Versus Saline for Wound Irrigation

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Rhode Island Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01341041
First received: April 11, 2011
Last updated: April 21, 2011
Last verified: April 2011

April 11, 2011
April 21, 2011
August 2004
December 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
cosmesis [ Time Frame: 72 hrs post-ED visit ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Cosmesis will be assessed by taking pictures of the wound at presentation, upon receiving sutures, 48-72 hrs later, and 3-4 mths later. At 3-4 mths the patient will rate how well they think the wound healed, via a visual analog scale. At that time, two blinded ER physicians will do this as well. They will also designate a wound evaulation score, based on criteria that will be provided to them. Two blinded plastic surgeons will assess all photographs, visual analog scores. and wound evaluation scores, and provide their own visual analog scale assessment of how well each wound healed.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01341041 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Chlorine Dioxide Versus Saline for Wound Irrigation
Wound Irrigation: Comparison of Normal Saline With Chlorous Acid Chlorine Dioxide Solution

This research is being done because the investigators are trying to examine the safety and effectiveness of this wound cleaning liquid, CACD (chlorine dioxide). The investigators are trying to see if this liquid has the ability to decrease infection rates and decrease the scarring effects from the healing process. In animal studies, CACD has been shown to decrease scar formation and decrease the risk of wound infections. CACD is also used for the treatment of burns to decrease infection rates and improve wound healing. CACD is not FDA approved for this specific use, but it is FDA and USDA approved for reducing bacterial contamination on meat and food products for human consumption. In addition, an investigational drug (IND) application has been submitted to the FDA for this study. The FDA has approved the use of this solution for this study.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 0
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Subject)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Wound - in Medical Care
  • Biological: chlorine dioxide
    one time wash with 50ppm CD solution
  • Biological: saline
    one time wash with 50-100 cc normal saline
  • Experimental: chlorine dioxide
    2 arms
    Intervention: Biological: chlorine dioxide
  • Active Comparator: saline
    one time wash with 50-100cc of normal saline
    Intervention: Biological: saline
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
201
June 2009
December 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-100 years old
  • simple laceration requiring irrigation & sutures
  • patient has method of contact
  • patient is willing to return to ED in 3-4 mths

Exclusion Criteria:

  • immunocompromised
  • consult required for repair
  • diabetic
  • require antibiotics
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT01341041
0334-03
Not Provided
Jonathan Valente MD, Rhode Island Hospital
Rhode Island Hospital
Not Provided
Not Provided
Rhode Island Hospital
April 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP