Study Evaluating AWBAT-D Versus the Standard of Care of Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites

This study has been terminated.
(P.I decided to prematurely end this study.)
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Christopher Attinger, M.D., Georgetown University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01252836
First received: December 1, 2010
Last updated: January 27, 2012
Last verified: January 2012

December 1, 2010
January 27, 2012
September 2010
April 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Time for donor site to heal with AWBAT-D [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
As compared to current standard of care, Tegaderm.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01252836 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Pain at donor site [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Pain at donor site is less than that of standard of care treatment, Tegaderm.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Study Evaluating AWBAT-D Versus the Standard of Care of Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites
Randomized, Prospective, Pilot Study Evaluating a Temporary Skin Substitute (AWBAT-D) Versus the Standard of Care in the Postoperative Treatment of Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites

Use of AWBAT-D on split thickness skin graft sites will reduce healing time and pain level.

The study is designed as a randomized-controlled trial to examine split thickness skin graft donor wound site healing using AWBAT-D compared to current standard of care: Tegaderm. This will involve randomizing subjects to treatment with the AWBAT-D dressing or Tegaderm and monitoring outcomes. The AWBAT-D device has collagen and we hypothesize that the wounds treated with it will heal faster and with a decreased pain level. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if there are differences in outcomes between AWBAT-D and Tegaderm in healing split thickness skin graft donor sites.

Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Healing of Donor Site
  • Pain Level
Device: AWBAT-D
Application of AWBAT-D bioengineered device
  • Placebo Comparator: Control
    Treatment with Tegaderm
    Intervention: Device: AWBAT-D
  • Experimental: AWBAT-D
    Application of AWBAT-D on donor site.
    Intervention: Device: AWBAT-D
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Terminated
1
April 2012
April 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is 18 years of age or older
  2. Subjects requiring a split-thickness skin graft with a wound size between 5 and 50cm2 and a depth between 12-18um.
  3. Ability and willingness to understand and comply with study procedures and to give written informed consent prior to enrollment in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects < 18 years of age
  2. Subjects with an allergy to porcine products.
  3. Subjects undergoing STSG with a wound size less than 5 cm2 or greater than 50cm2.
  4. Subjects undergoing STSG with a wound depth of less than 12um or greater than 18um.
  5. Subjects undergoing repeat skin graft harvesting at the same donor site.
  6. Has active malignant disease of any kind. A subject, who has had a malignant disease in the past, was treated and is currently disease-free, may be considered for study entry.
  7. Subjects participating in any other trials involving the split-thickness skin graft donor site.
Both
18 Years and older
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT01252836
2010-160
Yes
Christopher Attinger, M.D., Georgetown University
Georgetown University
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Christopher A Attinger, MD Georgetown University
Georgetown University
January 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP