Treatment With Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (2G TKI) Post Imatinib Failure Survey

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Bristol-Myers Squibb
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01188278
First received: August 24, 2010
Last updated: December 14, 2011
Last verified: December 2011

August 24, 2010
December 14, 2011
July 2010
December 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Predictive value of Hammersmith score on Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) [ Time Frame: CCyR at 6 month of 2GTKI treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

The purpose of this study is to determine predictive value of Hammersmith score on Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR), as assessed by the following:

  • Distribution of patients according to Hammersmith score levels
  • Characterization of association between Hammersmith score and occurrence of CCyR
  • Assessment of capacity of Hammersmith score to predict CCyR, using diagnostic test assessment methods.

This score is measured at the time of imatinib failure.

Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01188278 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Predictive value of Hammersmith score on Major Molecular Response (MMR) [ Time Frame: MMR at 3 month of 2GTKI treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

    The purpose of this study is to determine predictive value of Hammersmith score on Major Molecular Response(MMR), as assessed by the following:

    • Distribution of patients according to Hammersmith score levels
    • Characterization of association between Hammersmith score and occurrence of MMR
    • Assessment of capacity of Hammersmith score to predict MMR, using diagnostic test assessment methods.

    This score is measured at the time of imatinib failure.

  • Predictive factors of Overall survival (including Hammersmith score, MMR at 3 months and CCyR at 6 months of 2G TKI treatment together with patients, disease and treatment characteristics) [ Time Frame: From switch to 2G TKI between 01Jan2005 and 30Jun2009 to 31Oct2011 if alive or to the death ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Predictive value of Hammersmith score compared to other factors [ Time Frame: From switch to 2G TKI between 01Jan2005 and 30Jun2009 to 31Oct2011 if alive or to the death ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    imatinib treatment duration, mutations at time of failure, best response to imatinib, time between imatinib failure & initiation of 2G TKI on the response to 2G TKI & on the survival end points (Overall Survival (OS)& Progression Free Survival (PFS)).
  • Patients populations (socio-demographic data, medical history, disease history, co morbidities treated with 2G TKI [ Time Frame: When occurs the switch from Imatinib to 2G TKI between 01Jan2005 and 30Jun2009 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Patients' satisfaction, Quality of life & compliance to treatment in patients treated with 2G TKIs [ Time Frame: For all alive patients treated with 2G TKI during the enrolment period (Jun2010 to Oct2010) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Predictive value of Hammersmith score on Major Molecular Response (MMR) [ Time Frame: MMR at 3 month of 2GTKI treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

    The purpose of this study is to determine predictive value of Hammersmith score on Major Molecular Response(MMR), as assessed by the following:

    • Distribution of patients according to Hammersmith score levels
    • Characterization of association between Hammersmith score and occurrence of MMR
    • Assessment of capacity of Hammersmith score to predict MMR, using diagnostic test assessment methods.

    This score is measured at the time of imatinib failure.

  • Predictive factors of Overall survival (including Hammersmith score, MMR at 3 months and CCyR at 6 months of 2G TKI treatment together with patients, disease and treatment characteristics) [ Time Frame: From switch to 2G TKI between 01Jan2005 and 31Dec2007 to 31Oc2011 if alive or to the death ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Predictive value of Hammersmith score compared to other factors [ Time Frame: From switch to 2G TKI between 01Jan2005 and 31Dec2007 to 31Oc2011 if alive or to the death ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    imatinib treatment duration, mutations at time of failure, best response to imatinib, time between imatinib failure & initiation of 2G TKI on the response to 2G TKI & on the survival end points (Overall Survival (OS)& Progression Free Survival (PFS)).
  • Patients populations (socio-demographic data, medical history, disease history, co morbidities treated with 2G TKI [ Time Frame: When occurs the switch from Imatinib to 2G TKI between 01Jan2005 and 31Dec2007 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Patients' satisfaction, Quality of life & compliance to treatment in patients treated with 2G TKIs [ Time Frame: For all alive patients treated with 2G TKI during the enrolment period (Jun2010 to Oct2010) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Treatment With Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (2G TKI) Post Imatinib Failure Survey
Treatment With Second Generation TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS (2G TKI) Post Imatinib Failure: Factors Predicting Response and Predictive Value of Response

The purpose of this study is to determine predictive value of Hammersmith score on Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR).

Historic cohort prolonged by a 12-month follow-up period.

Prospective: look forward using periodic observations collected predominantly following subject enrollment: one year of follow up of patients with CP-CML alive at the time of the study.

Retrospective: look back using observations collected predominantly prior to subject selection and enrollment : historical data of patients with CP-CML initiated with a 2G TKIs post-imatinib failure (resistance or intolerance) between 1-Jan-2005 and 30-June-2009.

The inclusion of a historical cohort will allow a rapid enrollment of a large number of patients of this rare pathology, while the prospective follow up of this cohort would allow long term data to be obtained, including the assessment of the impact on survival and appreciate the patient's quality of life (QoL), compliance and satisfaction.

Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Non-Probability Sample

Hematology centers (hospitals) which have necessary historical data available

Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase (CML-CP)
Drug: Imatinib
Drug being observed but not provided
Other Names:
  • Dasatinib
  • Nilotinob
Patients in CP-CML treated with 2G TKI
Patients in CP-CML treated with 2G TKI (nilotinib or dasatinib) post imatinib failure
Intervention: Drug: Imatinib
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
420
December 2012
December 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Patients with Additional Chromosomal Anomalies (ACA) are accepted to be in CP. Patients enrolled in open-label clinical trials or other observational trials are also allowed (unless explicitly prohibited by the trial).

This trial does not prohibit participation in other observational trials.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with CP-CML. (ACA) are allowed
  • Age >18 years old
  • Prior treatment with imatinib monotherapy as first line treatment, to which the patient is deemed resistant or intolerant.Patients treated by INF and/or AraC prior (but not concomitant) to imatinib are eligible.
  • Initiated with a 2G TKIs post-imatinib failure (resistance or intolerance) between 1-Jan-2005 and 30-Jun-2009.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in (or with history of) accelerated or blastic phase CML
  • Patients treated by allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
  • Any other CML treatment except for INF and/or AraC,and a short period of Hydroxyurea or Anagrelide prior to imatinib.
  • Patients treated with 2G TKI for reasons other than imatinib failure.
  • Patients with no historical data (e.g. possibility of Sokal Score calculation) available.
  • Patients participating in clinical or observational trials which explicitly prohibit enrollment in non interventional studies.
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
 
NCT01188278
CA180-291
No
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Not Provided
Study Director: Bristol-Myers Squibb Bristol-Myers Squibb
Bristol-Myers Squibb
December 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP