Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Perfusion Pressure of Cosopt in Normal Tension Glaucoma
Recruitment status was Recruiting
| Tracking Information | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | July 26, 2010 | ||||||||
| Last Updated Date | April 15, 2011 | ||||||||
| Start Date ICMJE | March 2011 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | February 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01175902 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Perfusion Pressure of Cosopt in Normal Tension Glaucoma | ||||||||
| Official Title ICMJE | To Prove the Non-inferiority of Cosopt Compared to Xalatan in the Aspects of Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Subjects With Normal Tension Glaucoma | ||||||||
| Brief Summary | To prove the non-inferiority of the fixed timolol-dorzolamide combination (Cosopt) compared to 0.005% latanoprost (Xalatan) in the aspects of intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) in subjects with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) Clinical hypotheses. Primary hypothesis
Secondary hypothesis
|
||||||||
| Detailed Description | Cosopt (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) has well known effect for IOP reduction in POAG and OHT.3-5 However, there is no study about the effect and safety of Cosopt in NTG, Cosopt is not used the first line drug in the management of NTG. In Korea, the prevalence of NTG is higher than western countries, the majority (about 80-90%) of open angle glaucoma patients have an IOP of 21 mmHg or less, so the study of NTG is important and searching of effective drug for the treatment of NTG is necessary. In this study, we would prove the non-inferiority of Cosopt compared to Xalatan,6 which is used as a first line drug in the management of NTG, in the aspects of IOP and OPP including diastolic OPP (DOPP). A prospective, interventional, randomized, crossover, single masked, single center study. Forty-four NTG patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Patients in group A were treated with Cosopt, lubricant, and Xalatan for 4 weeks each, whereas patients in group B were treated with Xalatan, lubricant, and Cosopt for 4 weeks each. Recruit NTG patients, who are not treated with the glaucoma medication recent 2 months. If treated, after washout period of 4 weeks, the patients can be included in the study. Baseline IOP, systolic and diastolic BP will be measured. (Day 1) After 4 weeks of treatment of Cosopt or Xalatan, all participants will be checked diurnal IOP, systolic and diastolic BP. IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (mean of three consecutive readings) with the patient in a sitting position at the slit lamp. Every IOP will be measured by one masked glaucoma specialist who is unaware of the treatment assignments. After the IOP measurements, after a 5-minite rest, pulse rate and BP (systolic and diastolic) of radial artery were measured in the sitting position using a standard automated blood pressure cuff. During the period, all measuring instruments keep to be calibrated by the manufacturer's instruction. - OPP was calculated according to the following formula: OPP=(1/3 systolic BP + 2/3 diastolic BP) x 2/3 -IOP, diastolic OPP (DOPP)=diastolic BP-IOP. During the 4 weeks washout period, subjects will use lubricants.(Week 8) In this crossover study, with the other eye drops, the same measurement will be performed. (Week 12) |
||||||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||||
| Condition ICMJE | Normal Tension Glaucoma | ||||||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Study Arm (s) |
|
||||||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Recruiting | ||||||||
| Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | 44 | ||||||||
| Estimated Completion Date | August 2012 | ||||||||
| Estimated Primary Completion Date | February 2012 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | The identification of NTG was based on reproducible glaucomatous visual field defects, corresponding to typical ONH changes. Unilateral or bilateral visual field loss (description as below) as determined by at least two consecutive automated static threshold perimetry tests. One eye is randomly selected in the cases where both eyes are treated. Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
||||||||
| Gender | Both | ||||||||
| Ages | 45 Years to 75 Years | ||||||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | Yes | ||||||||
| Contacts ICMJE |
|
||||||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Korea, Republic of | ||||||||
| Administrative Information | |||||||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT01175902 | ||||||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | cosopt-IOP/OPP | ||||||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||||
| Responsible Party | Department of ophthalmology and visual science, College of medicine | ||||||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | The Catholic University of Korea | ||||||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Seoul St. Mary's Hospital | ||||||||
| Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||||
| Information Provided By | The Catholic University of Korea | ||||||||
| Verification Date | May 2010 | ||||||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||||||