Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Brilliant Blue Versus Indocyanine Green
The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified October 2007 by University of Cologne.   Recruitment status was  Recruiting
Study NCT01083004   Information provided by University of Cologne

First Received on March 8, 2010.   Last Updated on April 15, 2011   History of Changes

March 8, 2010
April 15, 2011
January 2008
May 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Best corrected far visual acuity (ETDRS) [ Time Frame: 1 year postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Visual acuity [ Time Frame: 1 year postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01083004 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Reading ability (Radner) [ Time Frame: 1 Year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Optical coherence tomography [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Quality of Life [ Time Frame: 1 Year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Optical coherence tomography [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Electroretinography [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
 
Brilliant Blue Versus Indocyanine Green
A Randomized Study Comparing Brilliant Blue and Indocyanine Green as Intravitreal Dye in Macular Pucker and Macular Hole

A study of non-inferiority design comparing brilliant blue and indocyanine green as intraoperative dye in macular pucker and macular hole.

 
Interventional
Phase III
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Macular Pucker
  • Macular Hole
  • Vitreoretinal Surgery
  • Procedure: Indocyanine green
    Using indocyanine green as intraoperative dye
  • Procedure: Brilliant blue arm
    Using brilliant blue as intraoperative dye
  • Active Comparator: Indocyanine green arm
    Intervention: Procedure: Indocyanine green
  • Active Comparator: Brilliant blue
    Intervention: Procedure: Brilliant blue arm
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
50
 
May 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age over 50
  • macular pucker or macular hole with subjective disturbances
  • All phakic or pseudophakic patients
  • far visual acuity better than 20/400
  • able to read, understand, and willing to sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any other ocular disease or conditions compromising the visual acuity other than macular hole or macular pucker
  • prior vitreoretinal surgery in the study eye
Both
50 Years and older
No
Contact: Albert Caramoy, MD 004902214784308 acaramoy@yahoo.co.uk
Germany
 
NCT01083004
BlueIce001
 
Prof. Dr. B. Kirchhof, University of Cologne
University of Cologne
 
Principal Investigator: Bernd Kirchhof, MD University of Cologne, Center of Ophthalmology, 50924 Cologne, Germany
University of Cologne
October 2007

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP