Study of Different Pain Scores in Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Samsung Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01064128
First received: February 5, 2010
Last updated: July 18, 2011
Last verified: July 2011

February 5, 2010
July 18, 2011
January 2010
December 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Pain score measured by visual analog scale [ Time Frame: postoperative 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01064128 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Modified body image scale and cosmetic scar scale [ Time Frame: postoperative 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Study of Different Pain Scores in Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Randomized Controlled Study of Different Pain Scores in Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Purpose:

The attempt to further reduce the operative trauma in laparoscopic hysterectomy led in new technique such as Single-Port Access (SPA) laparoscopic surgery. This new technique is considered as painless procedure and better cosmetic effect but there are not any publications to study a possible different pain score and cosmetic effect in new techniques versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy. In this randomized controlled study the researchers have investigated the pain scores and cosmetic satisfaction by modified body image scale and cosmetic scar scale.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Uterine Myoma
  • Uterine Adenomyosis
  • Procedure: conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
    conventional 3 or 4 ports laparoscopic hysterectomy
  • Procedure: SPA laparoscopic hysterectomy
    single-port access laparoscopic hysterectomy
  • Active Comparator: conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Three or four ports conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Intervention: Procedure: conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy
  • Active Comparator: SPA laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Single umbilical incision laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Intervention: Procedure: SPA laparoscopic hysterectomy
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
40
December 2010
December 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 30-60, female
  • Symptomatic (Dysmenorrhea, Palpable mass, Pelvic pain or discomfort, Urinary symptom, Increasing size, Menorrhagia) myomas or adenomyosis
  • Suspected uterine myoma and/or adenomyosis on transvaginal ultrasonography (USG)
  • At least a 6-month thorough follow-up record available
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Endometrial hyperplasia without myoma or adenomyosis
  • Body Mass Index more than 30
  • Huge uterus defined by longitudinal uterine diameter larger than 10cm and anteroposterior diameter larger than 8cm in USG
Female
30 Years to 60 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Korea, Republic of
 
NCT01064128
2009-09-093
Yes
Tae Joong, Kim/Clinical Assistant Professor, Samsung Medical Center
Samsung Medical Center
Not Provided
Not Provided
Samsung Medical Center
July 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP