| August 19, 2009 |
| June 21, 2010 |
| September 1999 |
| November 1999 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms score. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 nasal symptoms of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score. |
| Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00963599 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each symptom daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)), and the combined score of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score.
- Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms) [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Composite Symptoms scores were computed as the average of the Daytime Nasal Symptoms scores and Nighttime Symptoms scores collected on a 4 point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)).
- Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptom of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)). The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score.
- Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Congestion Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Congestion daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)).
- Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Rhinorrhea Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Rhinorrhea daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)).
- Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Itching Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Nasal Itching daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)).
- Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Sneezing Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Patients were asked to rate the nasal symptom of Sneezing daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)).
- Mean Change From Baseline in Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Patients were asked to rate the symptom of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening daily on a 4-point scale (0 (best) to 3 (worst)).
- Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis [ Time Frame: Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
An evaluation by the patient, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse).
- Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis [ Time Frame: Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
An evaluation by the physician, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse).
- Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score [ Time Frame: Week 2 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Patients completed a Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, 28 questions on a 7-point scale [0(best) to 6(worst)] across 7 domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, emotional. Scores per domain were averaged, then scores for the 7 domains were averaged for an overall score.
|
- Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Change from baseline in Composite Symptoms score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms) [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Congestion score [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change from baseline in Daytime Rhinorrhea score [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Itching score [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change from baseline in Daytime Sneezing score [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change from baseline in Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean change from baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score [ Time Frame: 2 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|
| Not Provided |
| Not Provided |
| |
| Montelukast in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis - Fall 1999 Study |
| A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Clinical Effect of Combination Montelukast/Loratadine in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis-Fall Study |
This study will evaluate the ability of oral montelukast/loratadine to improve the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with loratadine alone, montelukast alone and placebo. |
| Not Provided |
| Interventional |
| Phase 3 |
Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis |
- Drug: Comparator: montelukast/loratadine
montelukast 10 mg/loratadine 10 mg tablet taken once daily at bed time for 2 weeks
- Drug: Comparator: montelukast
montelukast 10 mg tablet taken once daily at bed time for 2 weeks
- Drug: Comparator: loratadine
loratadine 10 mg tablet taken once daily at bed time for 2 weeks
- Drug: Comparator: placebo
placebo tablet taken once daily at bed time for 2 weeks
|
- Experimental: 1
montelukast/loratadine
Intervention: Drug: Comparator: montelukast/loratadine
- Experimental: 2
loratadine
Intervention: Drug: Comparator: loratadine
- Experimental: 3
montelukast
Intervention: Drug: Comparator: montelukast
- Placebo Comparator: 4
placebo
Intervention: Drug: Comparator: placebo
|
| Not Provided |
| |
| Completed |
| 907 |
| November 1999 |
| November 1999 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient has a documented history of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms that flare up during the study season
- Patient is a nonsmoker
- Patient is in good general health
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient is hospitalized
- Patient is a woman who is less than 8 weeks postpartum or is breast-feeding
- Patient intends to move or vacation away during the study
- Patient has had any major surgery within 4 weeks of study start
- Patient is a current or past abuser of alcohol or illicit drugs
- Patient has been treated in an emergency room for asthma in the past month
- Patient had an upper respiratory infection with in 3 weeks prior to study start
- Patient has any active pulmonary disorder other than asthma
|
| Both |
| 15 Years to 85 Years |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
| Not Provided
| |
| NCT00963599 |
| 2009_645, MK0476A-117 |
| Not Provided
| Executive Vice President, Clinical and Quantitative Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp |
| Merck |
| Not Provided
| Study Director: |
Medical Monitor |
Merck |
|
|
| Merck |
| June 2010 |