Medico Economic Evaluation of Dermal Substitute Integra® for Coverage of Inferior Limb Traumatic Skin Loss (INTEGRA®)

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
University Hospital, Bordeaux
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00906672
First received: May 20, 2009
Last updated: May 7, 2013
Last verified: May 2013

May 20, 2009
May 7, 2013
June 2009
December 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Occurrence of at least one complication requiring a surgical re-intervention [ Time Frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Persistence of an important / major trouble of the scar measured by a "scar-trouble scale" filled in by the patient. [ Time Frame: at 18 month-follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Auto-evaluation of patient's scar esthetical result with a visual analog scale. [ Time Frame: at 18 month-follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00906672 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Occurrence of all post surgical complications [ Time Frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Duration of hospitalization and healing [ Time Frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Period until return to work and re-start of daily activities [ Time Frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Ïntensity of scar pain during cares evaluated with a visual analog scale and quality of life (EuroQol) [ Time Frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Human and medical requirements [ Time Frame: Within the first 18 months after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Medico Economic Evaluation of Dermal Substitute Integra® for Coverage of Inferior Limb Traumatic Skin Loss
Not Provided

Comparison of 2 techniques of surgery on patients with inferior limb traumatic wounds: the innovative technique Integra® and the technique of reference: the flap surgery.

Traumatic skin loss with bone or tendon exposure essentially affects inferior limbs. There are considered serious as they often lead to functional and esthetical consequences, and they generally affect young people.

Flap surgery is the treatment of reference for these skin losses. This technique requires expensive material and a lot of medical staff. The intervention and duration of hospitalisation are often long with heavy medication. Post surgery complications or disabling sequelea involve surgical re-interventions which increase duration of hospital stay and medical staff availability.

The dermal substitute Integra® (Integra LifeSciences Corporation) is an advanced wound care device comprised of a porous matrix of cross-linked bovine tendon collagen and glycosaminoglycan and a semi-permeable polysiloxane (silicone layer). This medical device allows formation of a neoderm. The silicon layer is a temporary layer which is removed when the neoderm is totally built. This surgery is fast, non-invasive, with short hospital stay and limited complications which can be treated easily.

Objective of the study: to assess medico-economic interest of innovative surgery using dermal substitute Integra® compared to the reference using flap surgery in the treatment of traumatic skin loss of inferior limbs. Assessment will be based on re-interventions incidence, long-term functional and esthetical scar results and total cost of each technique.

Study design: multicenter, randomized, open label, parallel design, clinical trial in 12 French plastic surgery / burn care centres.

Planned number of enrolled patients: 120 (80 patients receiving Integra® and 40 patients receiving the flap surgery). Patients will be randomized in 1 of the 2 groups, with an imbalance in favour of the innovative technique.

Duration of enrollment: 24 months Duration of patient follow up: 18 months

Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Leg Injuries
  • Ankle Injuries
  • Foot Injuries
  • Device: INTEGRA®
    A plaque of dermal substitute Integra® is adjusted to the size of the wound and sutured. A negative pressure bandage is placed on the wound. 7 to 11 days post surgery, the Integra® silicone layer is removed and the neoderm is covered with a skin graft.
  • Procedure: Flap technique
    A flap is a part of skin, cutaneous tissue or muscle that is taken from an healthy area of the body and put on the damaged area for coverage.
  • Experimental: INTEGRA®
    Intervention: Device: INTEGRA®
  • Active Comparator: Flap technique
    Intervention: Procedure: Flap technique
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
120
December 2013
December 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient with skin loss traumatic or chronic wound
  • wound located from mid third of the leg to distal extremity of feet
  • with muscle and/or tendon and/or bone and/or articulation exposure
  • requiring a first surgical intervention for the coverage of the skin loss
  • patient eligible to the Integra® surgery techniques
  • patient with social security affiliation
  • written informed consent signed by the patient or representative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bone fracture located in the skin loss
  • Non traumatic wound
  • Wound with muscle exposure only
  • Immunocompromised patient
  • Allergy to bovine collagen, glycosaminoglycans or silicon
  • patient with an healthstate that compromise the 18 months Follow-up
  • pregnant women / who intend to become pregnant within the 18 months of follow-up
  • Patient under administrative or legal supervision
Both
15 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
France
 
NCT00906672
CHUBX 2008/26
Yes
University Hospital, Bordeaux
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Not Provided
Study Chair: Geneviève CHENE, MD-PHD USMR (University Hospital, Bordeaux)
Study Director: Vincent CASOLI, MD-MHD University Hospital, Bordeaux
University Hospital, Bordeaux
May 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP