CT-Based Versus Conventional Simulation for Palliative Radiotherapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Alberta Health Services
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00862030
First received: March 13, 2009
Last updated: August 4, 2011
Last verified: August 2011

March 13, 2009
August 4, 2011
April 2009
January 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Not Provided
Not Provided
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00862030 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
CT-Based Versus Conventional Simulation for Palliative Radiotherapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Comparison of Two-versus Three-Dimensional Treatment Planning for Patients Receiving Chest Radiotherapy for Symptom Control

Radiotherapy (RT) treatment to the chest is a standard way of trying to decrease symptoms like cough or shortness of breath. Before any RT can be delivered, it must be planned, either using conventional x-rays ("fluoroscopy") or using computer tomography ("CT") scanning. This study is being done because the investigators do not know which of these two common ways of RT planning is better for balancing both treating the cancer and decreasing side effects.

Standard RT planning will be performed under conventional simulation, followed by CT-simulation (for study purposes only). Retrospectively, 3D treatment fields will be designed using the CT-simulation data, and compared to the actual treatment fields planned using x-rays. Coverage of the tumour volume will be assessed, together with doses, field sizes and beam positions, to determine relative undercoverage of tumour and overcoverage of normal tissue between the two planning methods, if any.

Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Cross-Sectional
Not Provided
Not Provided
Non-Probability Sample

20

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Procedure: CT- simulation scan
Patients who are receiving standard palliative radiotherapy planned under x-rays will also undergo 1 CT-simulation scan which they would otherwise not require. The planning x-rays and CT scan will then be compared dosimetrically
1
Study Cohort
Intervention: Procedure: CT- simulation scan
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
20
January 2011
January 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with local symptoms secondary to histologically-confirmed non-small cell lung cancer
  • Patients who will be receiving palliative-intent external beam radiotherapy
  • Patients who are clinically appropriate for conventional radiotherapy planning
  • Patients who can provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who cannot provide written informed consent
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Canada
 
NCT00862030
24639
No
Dr.Alysa Fairchild, Alberta Cancer Board
Alberta Health Services
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Dr. Alysa Fairchild, MD FRCPC Alberta Health Services
Alberta Health Services
August 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP