Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Proton Beam Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified June 2011 by Loma Linda University
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Loma Linda University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00857805
First received: March 5, 2009
Last updated: June 1, 2011
Last verified: June 2011

March 5, 2009
June 1, 2011
January 2009
January 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Overall survival [ Time Frame: lifetime ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00857805 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Time to progression [ Time Frame: Lifetime ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Downstaging [ Time Frame: Lifetime ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Proton Beam Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Randomized Controlled Trial of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Proton Beam Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Patients with tumor burden that exceeds Milan criteria are considered to receive one of the following locoregional treatments: transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection and proton beam radiation. The goals of these treatments are to control tumor growth, to downstage tumor size to meet Milan criteria, and to improve survival. Patients who exceed the Milan criteria benefit from downstaging, so they can be qualified for liver transplant. Patients who meet Milan criteria benefit from tumor control to bridge them to liver transplantation. TACE is considered the most common locoregional treatment that is used to treat HCC. Proton beam radiotherapy has been used in treating HCC in a few centers across the globe. Phase I and II trials showed a satisfactory safety and efficacy results. Loma Linda University Medical Center is one of these pioneering centers that use proton beam as a treatment for HCC. This is the first randomized trial in the medical field that will compare head-to-head the efficacy of TACE versus proton beam in treating HCC patients.

Not Provided
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
  • Procedure: Transarterial Chemoembolization
    Application of carboplatin, doxorubicin in ethiodol into the artery for one or more sessions.
    Other Name: (TACE)
  • Radiation: Proton Beam Radiotherapy
    Fifteen consecutive sessions
  • Active Comparator: 1
    Transarterial Chemoembolization
    Intervention: Procedure: Transarterial Chemoembolization
  • Active Comparator: 2
    Proton Beam Radiotherapy
    Intervention: Radiation: Proton Beam Radiotherapy
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
220
January 2013
January 2012   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients are candidates to receive both proton beam and TACE
  2. Patients with no evidence of metastasis or macrovascular invasion
  3. Patients with tumor burden that meets San Francisco criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are candidates for surgical resection
  2. Patients with lesion < 2 cm
  3. Patients who have contraindication to receive either TACE or proton
  4. Patients with serum alpha fetoprotein > 500
  5. Patients with metastasis or macrovascular invasion
  6. Patients treated previously for HCC by any locoregional treatment
  7. Patients with prior liver transplant
  8. Patients with Child class C
  9. Patients with MELD score of > 25
  10. Patients with other comorbid diseases that may impact survival
  11. Patients with ongoing alcohol intake
  12. Patients with active sepsis
  13. Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding within a week
  14. Patients unwilling to sign informed consent form
  15. Patients with history of noncompliance
Both
18 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact: Zeid Kayali, MD, MBA 909-558-3634 zkayali@llu.edu
Contact: Diane Scavone 909-558-3670 dscavone@llu.edu
United States
 
NCT00857805
58348
No
Zeid Kayali, MD, Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda University
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Zeid Kayali, MD Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda University
June 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP