Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss: The OPTIMAL Trial

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Susan Meikle, MD MSPH, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00597935
First received: January 9, 2008
Last updated: May 10, 2013
Last verified: May 2013

January 9, 2008
May 10, 2013
February 2008
July 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • For the surgical intervention: surgical "success" or "failure" is defined by: (1)an anatomic assessment of prolapse, and (2)the presence or absence of bulge symptoms specific to prolapse [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • For Pelvic Muscle Therapy: urinary symptoms as measured by the UDI of the PFDI [ Time Frame: 6 mo ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • For Pelvic Muscle Therapy: prolapse symptoms as measured by the POPDI subscale of the PFDI and anatomic outcomes [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • For the surgical intervention: surgical "success" or "failure" defined by: (1)an anatomic assessment of prolapse, and (2)the presence or absence of bulge symptoms specific to prolapse [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • For Pelvic Muscle Therapy: urinary symptoms as measured by the UDI of the PFDI [ Time Frame: 6 mo ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • For Pelvic Muscle Therapy: prolapse symptoms as measured by the POPDI subscale of the PFDI and anatomic outcomes [ Time Frame: 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00597935 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Quality of life [ Time Frame: 6 and 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss: The OPTIMAL Trial
Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss: The OPTIMAL Trial: A Randomized Trial of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation (SSLF) Versus Uterosacral Ligament Suspension (ULS) With and Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy/Pelvic Muscle Training

Pelvic organ prolapse is common among women with a prevalence that has been estimated to be as high as 30%. Pelvic organ prolapse often involves a combination of support defects involving the anterior, posterior and/or apical vaginal segments. While the anterior vaginal wall is the segment most likely to demonstrate recurrent prolapse after reconstructive surgery, reoperations are highest among those who require apical suspension procedures with or without repair of other vaginal segments (12%-33%). Despite the substantial health impact, there is a paucity of high quality evidence to support different practices in the management of prolapse, particularly surgery. Thus, the objectives of the Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss (OPTIMAL) Trial are:

  1. to compare sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) to uterosacral vaginal vault ligament suspension (ULS); and
  2. to assess the role of perioperative behavioral therapy/pelvic muscle training (PMT) in women undergoing vaginal surgery for apical or uterine prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
  • Procedure: SSLF
    sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF)
  • Procedure: ULS
    uterosacral vaginal vault ligament suspension (ULS)
  • Behavioral: PMT
    Pelvic muscle training and exercises (PMT)
  • Experimental: 1
    SSLF and PMT
    Interventions:
    • Procedure: SSLF
    • Behavioral: PMT
  • Experimental: 2
    ULS and PMT
    Interventions:
    • Procedure: ULS
    • Behavioral: PMT
  • Experimental: 3
    SSLF without PMT
    Intervention: Procedure: SSLF
  • Experimental: 4
    ULS without PMT
    Intervention: Procedure: ULS

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
439
July 2013
July 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stage 2 to 4 prolapse
  • Prolapse of the vaginal apex or cervix to at least half way into the vaginal canal (POPQ Point C > -TVL/2)
  • Vaginal bulge symptoms as indicated by an affirmative response to either questions on the PFDI
  • Vaginal surgery for prolapse is planned, including a vaginal apical suspension procedure.
  • Stress incontinence symptoms as indicated by an affirmative response to the PFDI Stress incontinence subscale
  • Documentation of transurethral stress leakage on an office stress test or urodynamics with or without prolapse reduction within the previous 12 months
  • A TVT is planned to treat stress urinary incontinence.
  • A PMT visit can be performed at least 2 weeks and not more than 4 weeks before surgery.
  • Available for 24-months of follow-up.
  • Able to complete study assessments, per clinician judgment
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to SSLF, ULS, or TVT in the opinion of the treating surgeon.
  • History of previous surgery that included a SSLF or ULS. (Previous vaginal vault suspensions using other techniques or in which the previous technique is unknown are eligible.)
  • Pelvic pain or dyspareunia due to levator ani spasm that would preclude a PMT program.
  • History of previous synthetic sling procedure for stress incontinence.
  • Previous adverse reaction to synthetic mesh.
  • Urethral diverticulum, current or previous (i.e., repaired)
  • History of femoral to femoral bypass.
  • Current cytotoxic chemotherapy or current or history of pelvic radiation therapy.
  • History of two inpatient hospitalizations for medical comorbidities in the previous 12 months.
  • Subject wishes to retain her uterus. [Both ULS and SLS include removal of the uterus, if not previously removed]
Female
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00597935
16P01, 2U01HD041249, 2U10HD041250, 2U10HD041261, 2U10HD041267, 1U10HD054136, 1U10HD054214, 1U10HD054215, 1U10HD054241
Yes
Susan Meikle, MD MSPH, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH)
Principal Investigator: Matthew Barber, MD The Cleveland Clinic
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
May 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP