Will CPAP Reduce Length Of Respiratory Support In Premature Infants? (OLIVIA)

This study has been terminated.
(Decreasing recruitment)
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Child and Family Research Institute
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Rebecca Sherlock, Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00486395
First received: June 13, 2007
Last updated: February 8, 2012
Last verified: February 2012

June 13, 2007
February 8, 2012
September 2007
January 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Length of respiratory support [ Time Frame: Variable ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
CPAP plus MV days
Length of respiratory support
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00486395 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Duration of ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy, pneumothorax rate and BPD by Walsh test, time to full feeds, time to regain birthweight, necrotizing enterocolitis, time to discharge, achievement of readiness for discharge criteria [ Time Frame: Variable ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Duration of ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy, pneumothorax rate and BPD by Walsh test, time to full feeds, time to regain birthweight, necrotizing enterocolitis, time to discharge, achievement of readiness for discharge criteria
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Will CPAP Reduce Length Of Respiratory Support In Premature Infants?
Offering Less Invasive Ventilation in Infants Born 28 to 32 Weeks Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

In Canada each year, there are approximately 800 infants born between 28 and 32 weeks gestation. Up to 60% of these infants will require breathing tube placement for Respiratory Distress Syndrome or RDS. RDS is a lung disease of prematurity due to a lack of a compound called surfactant. The breathing tube is placed as a conduit for placing surfactant into the babies' lungs to improve the lung disease. Most babies are then placed on a breathing machine or ventilator. Ventilation is not without harm and can be associated with lung damage, delays in feeding, increased hospital stay and interruption of bonding. An alternative that does not require the presence of a breathing tube is Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). We will randomize babies to either ventilation or CPAP to try to minimize the length of time the baby is kept on respiratory support.

Objectives: To determine whether infants 28 to 32 weeks gestational age with RDS treated with surfactant followed by CPAP have a shorter length of respiratory support (length of time on a ventilator and CPAP) than similar infants who are treated with MV after surfactant therapy; and to examine secondary outcomes including outcomes related to lung disease, feeding issues and hospital length of stay (secondary outcomes).

Hypothesis: The use of CPAP after surfactant in infants born 28 to 32 weeks with RDS will reduce the length of respiratory support as compared with infants treated with MV. We hypothesize that the incidence of lung disease and feeding issues will be similar between groups while length of hospital stay will be shorter in the CPAP group.

Methods: A multi-center, randomized trial conducted in seven neonatal intensive care units in Canada and France. Parents will be approached for consent prior to delivery or after the infant shows signs of RDS. Infants 28 to 32 weeks gestation with RDS will be eligible for the study. After intubation and surfactant administration, babies will be randomized to either receive CPAP or MV. Strict criteria for CPAP failure, weaning ventilation and weaning and discontinuing CPAP will be specified. Infants will be followed in the nursery until hospital discharge or until all outcomes have been determined.

Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Prematurity
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
  • Device: CPAP
    CPAP administered via "Bubble" method or Infant Flow Driver
  • Device: Mechanical ventilation
    Volume guarantee strategy
  • Active Comparator: 1
    Mechanical ventilation
    Intervention: Device: Mechanical ventilation
  • Experimental: 2
    CPAP
    Intervention: Device: CPAP
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Terminated
126
February 2011
January 2011   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Infants born greater than or equal to 28 weeks (28+0) and less than 32 weeks (31+6) gestation admitted to the NICU at a participating center
  2. Diagnosis of RDS in the first 24 hours of life requiring intubation for surfactant administration by any combination of the following: Classic clinical signs of RDS include tachypnea, moderate to severe intercostal and subcostal retractions, grunting respirations and oxygen needs of >0.30 and/or on CPAP of 5 to 6 H2O cm and/or radiographic signs of RDS including low lung volumes, a reticular-granular pattern of lung infiltrates and air bronchograms. A chest radiograph is not a mandatory criterion for the diagnosis of RDS if clinical signs are present
  3. Parental consent obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Infants with a major congenital anomaly
  2. Infants with pulmonary hypoplasia; 3. Infants known or suspected to have a neuromuscular disorder;
  3. Infants from mothers that had greater than 2 weeks ruptured membranes.
  4. Infants that had vigourous resuscitation including chest compressions and cardiac meds.
  5. No parental consent obtained.
Both
28 Weeks to 32 Weeks
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Canada
 
NCT00486395
07-08 005
Yes
Rebecca Sherlock, Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
Child and Family Research Institute
Principal Investigator: Rebecca L Sherlock, MD, FRCPC, PhD(c) Children's and Women's Health Centre of BC
Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
February 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP