Spinal Magnetic Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Singapore General Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00443469
First received: March 4, 2007
Last updated: March 30, 2010
Last verified: March 2010

March 4, 2007
March 30, 2010
August 2006
February 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Subjective pain score measurements [ Time Frame: 4 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
NAS score
Subjective pain score measurements after SMS
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00443469 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Spinal Magnetic Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain
A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial on the Use of Repetitive Spinal Magnetic Stimulation as a Therapeutic Option in Patients With Intractable Neuropathic Pain of the Lower Limbs

It involves delivering a train of magnetic pulses, 5 at each time, to the brain. In the present study, we are using the same method to treat severe pain due to nerve conditions. You will be given up to 1000 pulses in total over the spine in the lower back (Spinal Magnetic Stimulation or SMS). Each train will be given in 10-second intervals. You will have SMS on a single day. You will be given SMS pulses at 1 or 10 per second. No stimulation will be given over the head.

You will be assessed before and after the study for up to 1 week. Your usual medical treatment will be continued

You must be aware of that this is a placebo-controlled trial. This means that you may either receive real SMS or sham SMS. The latter involves a harmless process of ineffective stimulation, designed for comparison with real SMS. Whether you receive either form of treatment will be assigned randomly, and there will be a 50% chance of being assigned to either.

Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Neuropathic Pain
  • Device: magnetic stimulation
    SMS was delivered with a repetitive magnetic stimulator connected to a figure of eight coil capable of delivering a maximum output of 2 Tesla per pulse. The coil measured 90 mm in each wing and was centered over the surface landmark corresponding to the cauda equina region. SMS was performed with the patient lying comfortably in the prone position and a soft pillow supported the lower abdomen. The coil was placed flat over the back with the handle pointing cranially. Each patient on active treatment received 200 trains of 5 pulses delivered at 10 Hz, at an interval of 5 s between each train. As this was a pilot study, each only received 1000 pulses in a single session.
  • Device: Magnetic Stimulation with tilted coil
    The placebo arm consisted of 'sham' SMS delivered with the coil angled vertically and one of the wing edges in contact with the stimulation point. As this coil type allows maximum magnetic flux at the center of the intersection, we believe minimum or no stimulation was effected at the edge of the coil in contact with the patient. Stimulation parameters and duration were unchanged in this arm.
  • Experimental: Magnetic Stimulation
    Intervention: Device: magnetic stimulation
  • Placebo Comparator: Magnetic Stimulation with tilted coil
    Magnetic Stimulation with tilted coil
    Intervention: Device: Magnetic Stimulation with tilted coil
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
20
February 2010
February 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All with neuropathic lower limb pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to magnetic stimulation
Both
20 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Singapore
 
NCT00443469
#64/2006
Yes
A/Prof Lo YL, Singapore General Hospital, NNI
Singapore General Hospital
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: YL Lo, MD National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore General Hospital
Singapore General Hospital
March 2010

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP