Organ Protection for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Propofol Versus Desflurane
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | November 16, 2006 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | June 28, 2010 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | September 2007 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | January 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Postoperative cognitive decline [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ] | ||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Postoperative cognitive decline | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00400790 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Organ Protection for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Propofol Versus Desflurane | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | A Randomised Controlled Study of Organ Protection Comparing Desflurane and Propofol in Adult Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass | ||||
| Brief Summary | Background: Different anaesthetic agents have been shown to have different protective effects upon heart, brain and renal function under ischaemic conditions (oxygen starvation). Cardiopulmonary bypass takes over the work of the heart and the lungs during heart surgery, but oxygenation of vital organs such as the brain and heart may not be perfect, and can produce brain or heart damage as a consequence. Propofol and desflurane are commonly used anaesthetic agents, and there has been recent research to suggest that anaesthetic agents may provide some protection during periods where inadequate oxygenation occurs, with the potential to reduce the degree of organ damage. Both types of anaesthetics are used for cardiac surgery with anaesthetists choosing between them largely on the basis of personal preference. Aim: To determine whether the use of either propofol or desflurane as the primary anaesthetic agent, can lead to differences in postoperative brain function, total morbidity or cost, following coronary artery surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: Patients will be recruited by professional research staff and will be randomised into one of two groups (90 in each group). They will receive a standardized technique for anaesthesia, cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative ICU treatment. The only difference between the 2 groups will be as to which anaesthetic agent they receive during the surgical period, desflurane or propofol. Measurements will involve i) brain function testing before and 3 months after surgery ( a set of 10 verbal or manual tests), ii) incidence of delirium in the immediate postoperative period (a survey form), iii) incidence of total postoperative morbidity and iv) cost of hospital stay. Data collection will be by anaesthesia and research staff and a neuropsychologist will employed for performing the brain function testing. Anticipated timeline: Initial recruitment completed by 15-18 months following trial commencement. Follow up completed 3 month after the last enrolment. Data validation, statistical analysis and manuscript preparation completed by 24 months. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Aims To investigate whether there are differences in postoperative cognitive function, total morbidity or cost, following cardiac surgery determined by the use of either propofol or desflurane as the primary anaesthetic agent. Hypothesis The null hypothesis is that there are no differences in postoperative cognitive function, total morbidity or economic cost based on the type of primary anaesthetic delivered. Participants: Following human ethics committee approval, and informed written consent, 180 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery will be randomized to receive desflurane or propofol as the primary anaesthetic agent during surgery. This will be conducted at the Royal Melbourne Hospital. Data will be collected preoperatively, intraoperatively and throughout the entire hospital stay, and including a three-month follow-up. Eligibility criteria Inclusion Criteria Adult male and female patients aged 18 years or older, undergoing on-pump elective coronary artery bypass surgery with general anaesthesia.
Interventions Patients will receive either propofol or desflurane as the primary anaesthetic agent for the duration of this surgery. The following minor differences between groups are outlined:
The following anaesthesia, surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, and sedation techniques will be common for both groups:
Endpoints Primary Endpoint - neurological protection 1. Neurocognitive function testing (preoperative, prior to hospital discharge, and at 3 months postoperation) Secondary Endpoints
Tertiary endpoints 1. Cost of post-operative care The following endpoints are cumulative and reported for the entire hospital stay: Composite morbidity/mortality score This will be a weighted morbidity score. It will score 3 points for death, 2 points for a major morbid outcome and 1 point for any minor outcome. Major morbid outcome is defined as any outcome that is permanent (e.g. stroke) or has a natural history in that it could lead to death, but without actually causing death. It is derived from morbidity likely to result from inadequate tissue perfusion or immunomodulation. Economics Hospital economics will be assessed on multiple criteria;
Cost/economics estimations are taken from Australian published studies and index to 2006 prices. Investigation tests are based on rebates from the Medical benefit schedule. Both are listed below. The cost of re-operation is based on theatre time for four hours indexed to 2006 prices, and do not include doctors fees. The number of hospital days which will be charged as the hospital length of stay - ICU time. The actual cost of the operation are "fixed costs" (this only relates to the primary operation and not to reoperations). The cost that we are looking at, therefore are potentially variable costs which may be impacted upon by the possible use of volatile anaesthesia, or propofol. Obviously a return to OR would involve costs involving OR time, disposables including CPB circuits, and drugs (including aprotinin and recombinant factor VIIa). Sample size Estimates of power and minimal group size were obtained by performing a forward looking power analysis based upon the ability to show a significant difference in neurocognitive testing. This is based on our previous study showing a 38% incidence of neurocognitive abnormality in a group consistent with the propofol arm, and aiming for an effect size reduction of 50%. For an 80% power to reject the null hypothesis of no significance (P<0.05) in each group, the sample size is 90 patients in each group. Randomization The treating anaesthetist will allocate randomization by the sealed envelopes method. Implementation The patients will be recruited by professional research staff. Randomization will be implemented by the treating anaesthetist. Blinding The study will be open label for the treating anaesthetist who will also collect intraoperative data, and patient (as they will either have an inhalational induction or an intravenous induction, blinding is not possible), Preoperative and postoperative data will be collected by professional research staff who will be blinded to the treatment protocol. Statistical methods Continuous data collected over repeated measurement intervals will be examined by repeated measures ANOVA and adjusted for multisample asphericity by applying the Greenhouse Geisser correction. Categorical data will be analysed using Fischer's Exact test. Data will be corrected for multiple comparisons within families of endpoints using the Ryan-Holm Bonferroni correction. Intention to treat analysis will be performed. A blinded interim analysis of results will be performed by the data safety monitoring committee upon conclusion of enrolment of 80 patients. Stopping values to terminate the study will be set at a P value < 0.001 for primary endpoints. Timeline We anticipate initial recruitment will be complete 15-18 months following trial commencement. Follow up will be complete 3 month after the last enrollment. Data validation, statistical analysis and manuscript preparation will be complete by 24 months. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) | Not Provided | ||||
| Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 182 | ||||
| Completion Date | January 2010 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | January 2010 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years and older | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Australia | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00400790 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 0608121 | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
| Responsible Party | Colin Royse, University of Melbourne | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | University of Melbourne | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Baxter Healthcare Corporation | ||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | University of Melbourne | ||||
| Verification Date | January 2010 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||