Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Silodosin in the Treatment of the Signs and Symptoms of BPH

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Recordati Industria Chimica e Farmaceutica S.p.A.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00359905
First received: August 2, 2006
Last updated: February 18, 2009
Last verified: February 2009

August 2, 2006
February 18, 2009
May 2006
May 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Change in baseline total score on the International Prostate Symptom Score [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Change in baseline score on the International Prostate Symptom Score
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00359905 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Change in baseline obstructive subscore of the International Prostate Symptom Score; [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • change in baseline irritative subscore of the International Prostate Symptom Score; [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • change in baseline maximum urine flow rate; [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • safety [ Time Frame: 52 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Change in baseline obstructive subscore of the International Prostate Symptom Score;
  • change in baseline irritative subscore of the International Prostate Symptom Score;
  • change in baseline maximum urine flow rate;
  • safety
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Silodosin in the Treatment of the Signs and Symptoms of BPH
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Silodosin vs. Tamsulosin and Placebo in the Treatment of the Signs and Symptoms of BPH. Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial With an Optional Long-Term, Open-Label Extension Phase.

A new drug for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia is compared with placebo and tamsulosin (a drug belonging to the same therapeutic class) for to determine if it is safe and effective (the first phase of the study lasts approximately 18 weeks) and then is used for another 9 months to determine its long-term safety.

This is a multi-centre, double-blind, placebo and active controlled, parallel 12 week treatment trial in men with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, followed by a 9 month open-label phase. The following procedures are used: physical exams, electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urine flow rate, adverse events, concomitant medications, quality of life and compliance. 93 centres in 11 European countries (Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, UK) will be involved

Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Drug: Silodosin
    8 mg daily for 12 weeks
    Other Name: KMD3213
  • Drug: Tamsulosin
    0.4 mg daily for 12 weeks
    Other Name: Omnic
  • Drug: Placebo
    once daily for 12 weeks
  • Experimental: Silodosin
    Intervention: Drug: Silodosin
  • Active Comparator: Tamsulosin
    Intervention: Drug: Tamsulosin
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo
    Intervention: Drug: Placebo
Chapple CR, Montorsi F, Tammela TL, Wirth M, Koldewijn E, Fernández Fernández E; European Silodosin Study Group. Silodosin therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with suspected benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled clinical trial performed in Europe. Eur Urol. 2011 Mar;59(3):342-52. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
1228
January 2008
May 2007   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males in good general health and at least 50 years of age, with symptoms of moderate to severe Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical conditions that would confound the efficacy evaluation
  • Medical conditions in which it would be unsafe to use an alpha-blocker
  • Use of concomitant drugs that would confound the efficacy evaluation
  • Use of concomitant drugs that would be unsafe with this alpha-blocker
Male
50 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United Kingdom
 
NCT00359905
KMD3213-IT-CL 0215
No
Senior Clinical Project Leader, Recordati Industria Chimica e Farmaceutica S.p.A.
Recordati Industria Chimica e Farmaceutica S.p.A.
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Christopher Re Chapple, BSc MD Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Recordati Industria Chimica e Farmaceutica S.p.A.
February 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP