Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound Guided Needle Placement Versus Nerve Stimulation for Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Collaborators:
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
Information provided by:
University Health Network, Toronto
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00326261
First received: May 12, 2006
Last updated: December 17, 2008
Last verified: April 2006

May 12, 2006
December 17, 2008
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00326261 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound Guided Needle Placement Versus Nerve Stimulation for Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound Guided Needle Placement Versus Nerve Stimulation for Coracoid Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Nerve blocks for arm and hand surgery provide many advantages for patients including excellent pain control and reduction in general anesthesia-related adverse effects. Infraclavicular block is possibly the best method for performing regional anesthesia of the arm because of the consistent anesthesia of the whole arm and low incidence of serious adverse effects. Normally the anesthetist uses nerve stimulation to identify nerves supplying the forearm and hand. Recent research has indicated that to improve success from 60% to 79% two types of muscle stimulation must be sought before injection of local anesthetic. This can be time consuming, requires a significant learning process, increases complications and leaves 21% of patients with inadequate anesthesia requiring supplementation or general anesthesia. More recently practitioners have been using ultrasound imaging to direct the needle and watch local anesthetic spread around the nerves. Preliminary reports have documented that this technique is associated with much greater success than the nerve stimulation method. However a good quality study comparing the dual-endpoint infraclavicular technique with an ultrasound-guided technique has not been performed. This randomized study aims to rectify this deficiency by determining if ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block has a significantly greater success than the current standard, dual end-endpoint nerve stimulation technique.

Not Provided
Observational
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery
  • Procedure: Ultrasound compared to dual-endpoint nerve stimulator guided approach.
  • Procedure: Ultrasound
Not Provided
Brull R, Lupu M, Perlas A, Chan VW, McCartney CJ. Compared with dual nerve stimulation, ultrasound guidance shortens the time for infraclavicular block performance. Can J Anaesth. 2009 Nov;56(11):812-8.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery at or below the elbow.
  • Patients aged > 18 and < 80 years.
  • ASA I-III.
  • BMI < 35.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to read, write or speak English. (This is necessary because subjects will have to follow detailed instructions to allow testing of motor and sensory function. it is not feasible to have an interpreter present in the block room during performance of these procedures).
  • Contraindication to brachial plexus block.
  • Existing neurological deficit in the area to be blocked.
  • Known loco-regional malignancy or infection.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Allergy to local anesthetic agents.
  • Chest or shoulder deformities.
  • Severe respiratory disease.
  • Healed but dislocated clavicle fracture.
Both
18 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Canada
 
NCT00326261
03-0126-AE
Not Provided
Not Provided
University Health Network, Toronto
  • The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
  • Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
Principal Investigator: Colin JL McCartney, MBChB FRCA FCARCSI FRCPC University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital
University Health Network, Toronto
April 2006

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP