The Impact of Vocational Rehabilitation for Mentally Ill Veterans (VocRehab)

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Lori Davis, MD, Tuscaloosa Research & Education Advancement Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00260507
First received: November 29, 2005
Last updated: August 30, 2012
Last verified: August 2012

November 29, 2005
August 30, 2012
August 2006
June 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Using an intent to treat analysis, subjects' maintained employed rate is measured using the Employment Index. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Compared with standard VRP, veterans in SE will be less likely to drop-out of : i) a vocational rehabilitation program, ii) addiction treatment (if applicable), and iii) mental health treatment (if applicable).
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00260507 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Using an intent-to-treat analysis, the change from baseline to endpoint in PTSD symptoms is compared between groups using the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS). [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • (1) Compared with standard VRP, veterans in SE will have i) a greater likelihood of attaining and maintaining employment, ii) longer duration of sobriety, and iii) improved psychiatric symptomatology and neurocognitive function.
  • (2) Compared with standard VRP, veterans in SE will have improved: i) physical functioning; ii) mental functioning; and iii) overall quality of life.
  • (3) Compared with standard VRP, veterans in SE will have improved: i) physical functioning; ii) mental functioning; and iii) overall quality of life.
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
The Impact of Vocational Rehabilitation for Mentally Ill Veterans
The Impact of Vocational Rehabilitation on Mentally Ill Veterans

To study the impact of supported employment (SE) compared to standard vocational rehabilitation program (VRP) for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Hypotheses or Key Questions

I. Primary Hypothesis (obtained + maintained employment): Subjects assigned to IPS will have a higher maintained employed rate for the 12-mo observation period than their standard VRP counterparts.

I.a. First Component Primary Hypothesis (obtained employment): Subjects assigned to IPS will have higher rates of obtained employment for the 12-mo observation period than the VRP subjects.

I.b. Second Component Primary Hypothesis (maintained employment): Among those subjects employed, those assigned to IPS will have worked more weeks for the 12-mo observation period than the VRP subjects.

II. Secondary Hypothesis: Those subjects who obtain competitive employment will have significantly reduced symptoms of PTSD from baseline to endpoint compared to those subjects who do not obtain competitive employment.

III. Confirmatory and Correlational Hypotheses: Compared to VRP subjects, those subjects assigned to IPS will have:

  • greater work intensity (# weeks, days, # hours, wages earned)
  • higher total earnings
  • greater improvement in quality of life outcomes

Supplemental hypothesis (moderator): Because of the superior integration with the mental health (MH) treatment team, social work services, and community resources that the IPS-SE employment specialist provides as part of this model, we hypothesize that the IPS-SE model will have greater success in the maintenance of competitive employment compared to standard VRP for veterans with PTSD challenged in one or more of these psychosocial domains. From a research perspective, a variable that characterizes subjects for whom a particular treatment will be effective is called a moderator of treatment.

The hypothesized moderators of IPS-SE and standard VRP for subjects with PTSD are: 1) Transportation, 2) Housing, 3) Financial Means, and 4) Family Care Burden. We hypothesize that these variables will have moderating effects for each of two outcomes: 1) number of weeks the participant is competitively employed during the 12-month study period and 2) their score on the Sheehan Disability Scale.

Several principles are important in defining a moderator. First, the moderator must precede treatment. In our RCT, these psychosocial domains are baseline characteristics of subjects enrolled in the study. Second, the moderator must be uncorrelated with treatment choice. This will be the case in this RCT due to a 1:1 randomization, which should balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. Third, a moderator of treatment must have a differential effect of treatment for each level of the moderator. The treatment effect (e.g., active vs. comparator) must be shown to be greater for one level of the moderator (i.e. IPS-SE will show a greater effect size than standard VRP in subjects with a moderator present). Also, an index that combines these domains will be explored and formulated to identify subjects that may benefit to greater extent from IPS-SE.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
PTSD
  • Behavioral: Standard Vocational Rehabilitation
    Standard Vocational Rehabilitation (VRP) includes 1) the Vocational Assistance Program (includes routine prevocational testing and evaluation for all patients upon referral to VRP), 2) Vocational Rehabilitation Therapy that operates under the Compensated Work Therapy/Veterans Industries (CWT) and provides a work regimen with monetary incentives derived from contracts whereby participants are paid on a piece rate basis related to their production, and 3) Transitional Work Program (TWP) that includes a temporary work experience either within the VAMC or in community settings (called the Transitional Work External or TWE).
    Other Name: VRP
  • Behavioral: Supportive Employment
    Supported Employment (SE) involves: a vocational rehabilitation employment specialist who is integrated into the clinical treatment team, carries out all phases of the vocational services, provides predominantly community-based services, provides assertive engagement and outreach, has a case load of ≤ 25 clients; engages in rapid job search, individualized placement in diverse and potentially permanent competitive job(s), ongoing work-based vocational assessment, and assistance in finding subsequent jobs if needed with the view that all jobs are positive learning experiences; continuous time-unlimited follow-along supports to provide vocational services; and weekly group supervision with IPS/VRP team and with IPS supervisor/trainer monthly.
    Other Name: SE
I
Veterans with PTSD in VA Vocational Rehabilitation Program
Interventions:
  • Behavioral: Standard Vocational Rehabilitation
  • Behavioral: Supportive Employment
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
100
December 2012
June 2010   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion

  • Signed informed consent
  • Diagnosis of PTSD (based on MINI)
  • Male or female
  • Any race or ethnicity
  • Age 19-60
  • Currently unemployed
  • Interested in competitive employment
  • Planning to remain in a 100-mile radius of participating VAMC for the 12- mo duration

Exclusion

  • Lifetime history of severe traumatic brain injury that has resulted in severe cognitive disorder
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar I disorder
  • Dementia (a standard exclusion from VRP)
  • Immediate need of detoxification from alcohol or drugs (a standard VRP exclusion)
  • Pending active legal charges or expected incarceration
Both
19 Years to 60 Years
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00260507
D40921
No
Lori Davis, MD, Tuscaloosa Research & Education Advancement Corporation
Tuscaloosa Research & Education Advancement Corporation
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Lori L. Davis, MD Psychiatrist/Coordinator of Research and Development
Tuscaloosa Research & Education Advancement Corporation
August 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP