Dexmedetomidine for Continuous Sedation

This study has been terminated.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00226785
First received: September 23, 2005
Last updated: November 10, 2006
Last verified: November 2006

September 23, 2005
November 10, 2006
October 2005
Not Provided
  • Proportion of time during sedative infusion with a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score within the individually-prescribed target range
  • Time from ICU admission to discharge
  • Proportion of time during sedative infusion with a RASS score within the individually-prescribed target range.
  • Time from ICU admission to discharge.
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00226785 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Nurse's assessment of subject communication
  • Duration of mechanical ventilation, weaning time and ventilator-free days in ICU
  • Length of total hospital stay
  • Functional recovery during hospitalisation
  • Need for rescue medication to maintain sedation
  • Frequency of delirium
  • Frequency of organ failures and failure-free days
  • Frequency of critical illness polyneuropathy
  • ICU- and in-hospital survival
  • Cost of care in the ICU
  • Total cost of hospitalisation
  • Blood levels of dexmedetomidine seen with long-term treatment
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Dexmedetomidine for Continuous Sedation
A Prospective, Multi-Centre, Randomised, Double-Blind Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine With Propofol/Midazolam for Continuous Sedation (24 Hours to 14 Days) of Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care Unit

The study aims to demonstrate that dexmedetomidine is non-inferior to current best practice sedation with propofol/midazolam and daily sedation stops, in maintaining a target depth of sedation in long-stay intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and that dexmedetomidine, compared with current best practice, reduces the length of ICU stay.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double-Blind
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Conscious Sedation
Drug: Dexmedetomidine
Not Provided
Ruokonen E, Parviainen I, Jakob SM, Nunes S, Kaukonen M, Shepherd ST, Sarapohja T, Bratty JR, Takala J; "Dexmedetomidine for Continuous Sedation" Investigators. Dexmedetomidine versus propofol/midazolam for long-term sedation during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Feb;35(2):282-90. Epub 2008 Sep 16.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Terminated
900
July 2006
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical need for sedation and mechanical ventilation
  • Receiving full intensive care life support
  • Expected stay in ICU of at least 48 hours (h) from time of admission
  • Expected requirement for sedation of at least 24h from time of randomisation
  • Written informed consent within 36h of ICU admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute severe neurological disorder
  • Acute uncompensated circulatory failure at time of randomisation
  • Severe bradycardia
  • Atrioventricular (AV) conduction block (II-III) unless pacemaker fitted
  • Severe hepatic impairment
  • Need for muscle relaxation at time of randomisation
  • Loss of hearing or vision or any condition interfering significantly with RASS assessment
  • Positive pregnancy test or currently lactating
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Finland,   Switzerland
 
NCT00226785
3005011
Not Provided
Not Provided
Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma
Not Provided
Study Chair: Jukka Takala, MD, PhD University/University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Principal Investigator: Esko Ruokonen, MD, PhD Kuopio University Hospital, Finland
Principal Investigator: Stephan Jakob, MD, PhD University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma
November 2006

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP