CPAP Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
University Hospital, Rouen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00213681
First received: September 14, 2005
Last updated: December 29, 2005
Last verified: September 2005

September 14, 2005
December 29, 2005
November 2002
Not Provided
Improvement in PaCO2 at the end of ventilation
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00213681 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Endotracheal intubation, myocardial infarction and mortality during the first 24 hours
  • Duration of the ventilation
  • Blood gases, vital signs
  • Time to transfer to medical ward
  • Time to hospital discharge
  • Easiness to use was evaluated by nurses
  • Patients operational tolerance
  • Complications of each ventilation mode
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
CPAP Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
CPAP Boussignac Versus Bilevel Pressure Support Ventilation in Severe Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

To evaluate whether bilevel positive airway pressure more rapidly improves ventilation than continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with acute pulmonary edema. CPAP is delivered via a simple device connected to oxygen.

Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Severe Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
Device: Boussignac CPAP - bilevel ventilation support
Not Provided
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
Not Provided
March 2005
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 16 yrs, acute onset of severe respiratory distress, bilateral rales and typical findings of congestion on chest radiograph
  • breathing frequency of > 30/min, SpO2 >90%, use of accessory respiratory muscles
Both
Not Provided
Not Provided
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
 
NCT00213681
2001/059/HP
Not Provided
Not Provided
University Hospital, Rouen
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Fabienne MORITZ, MD University Hospital, Rouen
University Hospital, Rouen
September 2005

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP