Clinical Trial of Integrated Treatment Versus Standard Treatment in First Episode Psychosis
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting
| Tracking Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | September 8, 2005 | ||||
| Last Updated Date | April 25, 2006 | ||||
| Start Date ICMJE | January 1998 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | Not Provided | ||||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00157313 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | ||||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
| Descriptive Information | |||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Clinical Trial of Integrated Treatment Versus Standard Treatment in First Episode Psychosis | ||||
| Official Title ICMJE | Randomised Clinical Trial of Integrated Treatment Versus Standard Treatment in First Episode Psychosis | ||||
| Brief Summary | The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of integrated treatment for patients with a first episode of psychotic illness. We conducted a randomised clinical trial in Copenhagen Hospital Corporation and Psychiatric Hospital Aarhus, Denmark. We included 547 patients with first episode of schizophrenia spectrum disorder, who has not received antipsychotic medication for more than 12 weeks. Patients were randomised to integrated treatment or standard treatment. The integrated treatment lasted for two years and consisted of assertive community treatment with programmes for family involvement and social skills training. Standard treatment offered contact with a community mental health centre. We wanted to study the effect on psychotic (hallucinations and delusions)and negative (lack of initiative, apati, blunted affect) symptoms (each scored from 0 to a maximum of 5) at one and two years’ follow-up. We found that integrated treatment improved clinical outcome and adherence to treatment. The improvement in clinical outcome was consistent at one year and two year follow-ups. We will study further outcome measures such as social network, quality of life, depression and suicidal behaviour. |
||||
| Detailed Description | Objectives: To evaluate the effects of integrated treatment for patients with a first episode of psychotic illness. Design: Randomised clinical trial. Setting: Copenhagen Hospital Corporation and Psychiatric Hospital Aarhus, Denmark Participants: 547 patients with first episode of schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Interventions: Integrated treatment and standard treatment. The integrated treatment lasted for two years and consisted of assertive community treatment with programmes for family involvement and social skills training. Standard treatment offered contact with a community mental health centre. Main outcome measures: Psychotic and negative symptoms (each scored from 0 to a maximum of 5) at one and two years’ follow-up. Results: At one year’s follow-up, psychotic symptoms changed favourably to a mean of 1.09 (standard deviation 1.27) with an estimated mean difference between groups of –0.31 (95% confidence interval –0.55 to –0.07, P=0.02) in favour of integrated treatment. Negative symptoms changed favourably with a estimated difference between groups of –0.36 (–0.54 to –0.17, P<0.001) in favour of integrated treatment. At two years’ follow-up the estimated mean difference between groups in psychotic symptoms was –0.32 (0.58 to –0.06, P=0.02) and in negative symptoms was –0.45 (–0.67 to –0.22, P<0.001), both in favour of integrated treatment. Patients who received integrated treatment had significantly less comorbid substance misuse, better adherence to treatment, and more satisfaction with treatment. Conclusion: Integrated treatment improved clinical outcome and adherence to treatment. The improvement in clinical outcome was consistent at one year and two year follow-ups. |
||||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||
| Condition ICMJE |
|
||||
| Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
| Study Arm (s) | Not Provided | ||||
| Publications * |
|
||||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
| Recruitment Information | |||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Active, not recruiting | ||||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 600 | ||||
| Completion Date | December 2005 | ||||
| Primary Completion Date | Not Provided | ||||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: |
||||
| Gender | Both | ||||
| Ages | 18 Years to 45 Years | ||||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
| Location Countries ICMJE | Denmark | ||||
| Administrative Information | |||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT00157313 | ||||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | OPUS trial | ||||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | Not Provided | ||||
| Responsible Party | Not Provided | ||||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | Bispebjerg Hospital | ||||
| Collaborators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
| Information Provided By | Bispebjerg Hospital | ||||
| Verification Date | September 2005 | ||||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
|||||