Functional Interest of Non Invasive Brain Stimulation During Physiotherapy at a Subacute Phase Post Stroke (Anodal Protocol): ReSTIM
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Previous research that utilises single sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have demonstrated functional improvements. However these improvements are usually short-lived, lasting less than one hour before the patient's performance returns to baseline. In these studies, tDCS is typically applied with the goal of adaptively enhancing functional activation of pathologically under-active tissue or suppressing pathologically over-active tissue. Interestingly, a small body of evidence is now emerging to indicate that tDCS can improve learning/memory functions in healthy controls. The goal of this study is to test if the application of tDCS could enhance learning and/or memory for physiotherapy rehabilitation, which may in turn lead to correspondingly greater motor improvement. Patients at a subacute stage (1 to 6 month post stroke) will attend for 10 consecutive daily sessions of tDCS.
This research has important implications; previous studies suggest that such an approach has the potential to facilitate physical rehabilitation post-stroke and establish tDCS as a clinically viable rehabilitative tool. Recovery of motor skills may take many months to acquire and therefore strategies that have the potential to enhance acquisition of skill are of practical and scientific interest.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Stroke |
Device: anodal tDCS (device) Eldith DC-Stimulator Device: Sham tDCS |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Functional Interest of Non Invasive Brain Stimulation During Physiotherapy at a Subacute Phase Post Stroke (Anodal Protocol). |
- Fugl Meyer Assessment (Upper extremity) of motor recovery following stroke [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Main primary outcome is change in score between the baseline session score and day 32.
- Functional independence scale (MIF) [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.
- Motor Activity Log (MAL) [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.
- Jebsen Taylor Hand function test (JTT) [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.
- Box and block test (BBT) [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.
- Modified Ashworth Scale [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.
- Testing motor MRC [ Time Frame: assessed at one baseline session (day 4), and then again immediately following the last day of the intervention (day 18), 2 weeks (day 32), 1 month, 3 months and 6 months later. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]We are looking for a change in scores between the baseline session score, and those collected during each follow-up session.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 20 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | July 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | July 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS and motor training: sham comparator
Participants will receive sham tDCS over the primary motor cortex of the ipsilesional hemisphere during 20 minutes of motor training (10 consecutive sessions Monday-Friday during two weeks). Intervention: placebo tDCS Other: Motor Training |
Device: Sham tDCS
Participants will receive sham tDCS over the primary motor cortex of the ipsilesional hemisphere during 20 minutes of motor training (10 consecutive sessions Monday-Friday during two weeks).
|
|
Experimental: Anodal tDCS and motor training: experimental
Participants will receive anodal tDCS over the primary motor cortex of the ipsilesional hemisphere. The following parameters will be used: stimulation intensity of 1mA during 20 minutes of motor training (10 consecutive sessions Monday-Friday during two weeks). Interventions:
|
Device: anodal tDCS (device) Eldith DC-Stimulator
tDCS applied to the motor cortex every day of two consecutive weeks (10 sessions) at 1 mA during 20 minutes. Conductive rubber covered by sponges soaked in saline will be used, held in place by a band. The current will be gradually increased over 100 seconds.
Other Name: Eldith DC-Stimulator (CE certified)
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- All subjects must be between the ages of 18-90 and must not be pregnant.
- Patients volunteer to participate in the study, with a written informed consent signed
- Affiliation to a national health insurance program
- First-time clinical ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident - evidenced by a radiological (or physician's) report
- Contralesional motor deficit
- Lesion sparing primary motor cortex
- Stroke onset >1 month and <6 months prior to study enrollment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Coexistent major neurological or psychiatric disease as to decrease number of confounders
- History of epilepsy before stroke (or episodes of seizures within the last six months)
- Any substantial decrease in alertness, language reception, or attention that might interfere with understanding instructions for motor testing
- Subjects with global aphasia and deficits of comprehension
- Excessive pain in any joint of the paretic extremity (VAS>4)
- Contraindications to Tdcs : metal in the head, implanted brain medical devices
- Coexistent major neurological or psychiatric disease as to decrease number of confounders
- A history of significant alcohol or drug abuse in the prior 6 months
- Anyone who is currently taking or who has taken anti-malarial treatment in the last 72 hours
- Subjects may not have already received constraint induced motor therapy and/or tDCS treatment for stroke
- Pregnancy
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Sophie JACQUIN-COURTOIS, MD | + 33 4 78 86 52 68 | sophie.courtois@chu-lyon.fr |
| France | |
| Centre de Lay-Saint-Christophe-Institut Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation | Recruiting |
| Lay Saint Christophe, France, 54690 | |
| Contact: Matthieu KANDEL, MD + 33 3 83 22 22 31 matthieukandel@yahoo.fr | |
| Principal Investigator: Matthieu KANDEL, MD | |
| Hospices Civils de Lyon- Hôpital Henry Gabrielle-Service de Médecine Physique et Réadaptation | Recruiting |
| Saint Genis Laval, France, 69235 | |
| Contact: Sophie JACQUIN-COURTOIS, MD + 33 4 78 86 52 68 sophie.courtois@chu-lyon.fr | |
| Principal Investigator: Sophie JACQUIN-COURTOIS, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Sophie JACQUIN-COURTOIS, MD | Hospices Civils de Lyon |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Hospices Civils de Lyon |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01500564 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2010.635 |
| Study First Received: | December 22, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | December 27, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) |
Keywords provided by Hospices Civils de Lyon:
|
Stroke transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) motor function |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Stroke Cerebral Infarction Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases |
Nervous System Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Brain Infarction Brain Ischemia |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013