Study of Vascular Healing With the Combo Stent Versus the Everolimus Eluting Stent in ACS Patients by Means of OCT (REMEDEE-OCT)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
OBJECTIVE It is the objective of the REMEDEE OCT study to assess vascular healing after deployment of the Abluminal Sirolimus Coated Bio-Engineered Stent (Combo Bio-Engineered Sirolimus Eluting Stent) in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) with single de novo native coronary artery lesions ranging in diameter from ≥2.5 mm to ≤3.5 mm and ≤ 20 mm in length.
STUDY DESIGN The REMEDEE OCT study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized study designed to enroll 60 patients with ACS who will be randomized 1:1 to be treated with the Combo stent versus the commercially available everolimus eluting stent (Xience V or Promus). Patients will receive Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and Quatitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) follow-up imaging at 60 days post procedure. Clinical follow-up is scheduled at 30, 60, 180, 360 and 540 days. Furthermore, QCA and OCT will also be performed at baseline in all participants of the study.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Coronary Artery Disease Atherosclerosis Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Myocardial Infarction (MI) |
Device: PTCA with stent placement |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Vascular Healing After Deployment of the Abluminal Sirolimus Coated Bio-Engineered (Combo) Stent Versus the Everolimus Eluting Stent in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome by Means of OCT |
- Percentage of uncovered stent struts per stent at follow-up (OCT) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Secondary Clinical Endpoint: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) [ Time Frame: 30, 60, 180, 360, 540 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)defined as a composite of death, Myocardial Infarction (MI) (Q wave or non-Q wave), emergent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), or justified target lesion revascularization (TLR) by repeat Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) at hospital discharge
- Secondary Clinical Endpoint: components of MACE: cardiac death [ Time Frame: 30, 60, 180, 360, 540 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]cardiac death
- Secondary Clinical Endpoints: components of MACE: MI [ Time Frame: 30, 60, 180, 360, 540 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]MI (Q wave or non-Q wave)
- Secondary Clinical Endpoints: components of MACE: CABG or re-PTCA of target lesion [ Time Frame: 30, 60, 180, 360, 540 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]emergent coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), or clinically justified target lesion revascularization (TLR) by repeat PTCA or CABG at hospital discharge
- Secondary Clinical Endpoints: Stent thrombosis [ Time Frame: 30, 60, 180, 360, 540 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Target vessel stent thrombosis per Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definition
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (1/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percentage of stent strut malapposition
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (2/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Maximum length of segments (mm) with uncovered struts
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (3/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Maximum length of segments (mm) with malapposed struts
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (4/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Maximum malapposition distance (mm)
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (5/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Total malapposition volume
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (6/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Maximal malapposition volume
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (7/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Mean neointimal thickness (NIT)(strut level)
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (8/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percentage of protruding struts per stent
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (9/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Frequency of Abnormal Intrastent Tissue (AIST)
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (10/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Stent Volume
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (11/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Lumen Volume
- Secondary OCT Endpoints (12/12) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Neointimal Hyperplasia (NIH) Volume
| Estimated Enrollment: | 60 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | August 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Combo Stent
PTCA with Combo Stent
|
Device: PTCA with stent placement
PTCA with stent placement (Drug Eluting Stent)
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Everolimus Eluting Stent (EES)
PTCA with DES (Everolimus Eluting Stent: Xience V or Promus)
|
Device: PTCA with stent placement
PTCA with stent placement (Drug Eluting Stent)
Other Names:
|
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria
- age ≥18 and ≤ 80 years
- ST or Non-ST-segment elevation MI (assumed to be a type 1)
- Acceptable CABG candidate
- Patient willing to comply with specified follow-up
- Patient or legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has been provided written informed consent
- Single de novo or non-stented restenotic lesion in a native coronary artery
- Patients with 2-vessel coronary disease, may have undergone successful treatment (<20% diameter stenosis by visual estimate) of the non-target vessel with approved devices up to and including the index procedure but must be prior to the index target vessel treatment. Any non-target vessel or lesion intended to be treated during the index procedure or follow-up, cannot be an unprotected left main, ostial lesion, chronic total occlusion, heavily calcified, bifurcation, vein grafts, be anything requiring atherectomy, thrombectomy, or pre-treatment with anything other than balloon angioplasty; 8. Target lesion (maximum length is 20 mm by visual estimate) to be covered by a single stent of max 23 mm (stent coverage incl at least 3 mm of healthy vessel is recommended). The lesion length to be measured after pre-dilation 9. Reference vessel diameter ≥2.5 to ≤ 3.5 mm by visual estimate 10. The vessel diameter should be measured after pre-dilation procedure and after intra-coronary nitroglycerin if spasm is suspected 11. Target lesion ≥50% and <100% stenosed by visual estimate
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure. Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done within 7 days prior to the index procedure per site standard test
- Impaired renal function or on dialysis
- Platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3 or a WBC<3,000 cells/mm3
- Patient has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or patients in whom anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated
- Patient requires low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment postprocedure or has received a dose of LMWH ≤8 hours prior to index procedure
- Patient has received any organ transplant or is on a waiting list for any organ transplant;
- Patient has other medical illness or known history of substance abuse that may cause non-compliance with the protocol, confound the data interpretation or is associated with a limited life expectancy (<1 year)
- Patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin/bivalirudin, clopidogrel/ticlopidine, prasugrel, stainless steel alloy, sirolimus and/or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated
- Patient has previously received murine therapeutic antibodies and exhibited sensitization through the production of Human Anti-Murine Antibodies
- Patient presents with cardiogenic shock
- Patient has extensive peripheral vascular disease that precludes safe 6 French sheath insertion;
- Any significant medical condition which in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with the patient's optimal participation in the study
- Currently participating in another investigational drug or device study or patient in inclusion in another investigational drug or device study during follow-up
- Unprotected left main coronary artery disease with ≥50% stenosis
- Ostial target lesion(s)
- Totally occluded target vessel (TIMI flow 0)
- Calcified target lesion(s) which cannot be successfully predilated
- Target lesion has excessive tortuosity unsuitable for stent delivery and deployment;
- Target lesion involving bifurcation with a side branch ≥2.0 mm in diameter (either stenosis of both main vessel and major side branch or stenosis of just major side branch) that would require intervention of diseased side branch
- A significant (>50%) stenosis proximal or distal to the target lesion that cannot be covered by same single stent
- Diffuse distal disease to target lesion with impaired runoff
- Pre-treatment with devices other than balloon angioplasty
- Prior stent within 10 mm of target lesion
- Intervention (PCI or bypass) of any lesion in the target vessel performed within the previous 6 months
- Intervention (PCI or bypass) of another lesion in a non-target vessel performed within 30 days prior to the index
- Planned intervention of another lesion (target vessel or non-target vessel) within 30 days.
Contacts and Locations| Belgium | |
| OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst | |
| Aalst, Belgium, 9300 | |
| AZ Middelheim | |
| Antwerp, Belgium, 2020 | |
| Finland | |
| Satakunta Central Hospital | |
| Pori, Finland, 28500 | |
| Netherlands | |
| Academisch Medisch Centrum | |
| Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ | |
| Switzerland | |
| University Hospital Zurich | |
| Zurich, Switzerland, 8032 | |
| United Kingdom | |
| King's College Hospital | |
| London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS | |
| Principal Investigator: | Ulf Landmesser, MD, PhD | University of Zurich |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | OrbusNeich |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01405287 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | VP-0509, 36383 |
| Study First Received: | July 26, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | June 11, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Switzerland: Swissmedic Switzerland: Ethikkommission Belgium: Ethics Committee Belgium: Federal Agency for Medicinal Products and Health Products Netherlands: Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC) Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) Netherlands: Dutch Health Care Inspectorate United Kingdom: Research Ethics Committee United Kingdom: National Health Service Finland: Ethics Committee Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health |
Keywords provided by OrbusNeich:
|
stent drug eluting stent healing endothelium |
DES OCT MI ACS |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Atherosclerosis Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Coronary Disease Infarction Myocardial Infarction Acute Coronary Syndrome Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Heart Diseases Ischemia Pathologic Processes Necrosis |
Angina Pectoris Chest Pain Pain Signs and Symptoms Everolimus Sirolimus Immunosuppressive Agents Immunologic Factors Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Antibiotics, Antineoplastic Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses Antifungal Agents Anti-Infective Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013