Computed Tomography Versus Exercise Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (CRESCENT)
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified July 2011 by Erasmus Medical Center
Sponsor:
Erasmus Medical Center
Information provided by:
Erasmus Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01393028
First received: June 27, 2011
Last updated: July 12, 2011
Last verified: July 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Direct non-invasive coronary imaging by computed tomography (CT) has the potential to improve the workup of patients with stable chest pain complaints. The objective of the study is to compare in a randomized fashion the effectiveness and efficiency of a CT angiographic driven workup of suspected coronary artery disease in comparison to the standard workup using stress testing.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Angina Pectoris Chest Pain |
Other: Cardiac CT Other: Standard care |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
| Official Title: | Computed Tomography Versus Exercise Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease |
Resource links provided by NLM:
MedlinePlus related topics:
Angina
CT Scans
Chest Pain
Coronary Artery Disease
Exercise and Physical Fitness
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by Erasmus Medical Center:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Chest pain [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Reduction of chest pain symptoms by standardized questionnaire, at one year follow-up
- Class IA Revascularizations [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Number of revascularizations with an ESC class 1A indication
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Overall medical expenses [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Overall medical expenses
- Cost-effectiveness [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the overall quality of life and medical expenses at one year.
- Radiation dose [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Cumulative radiation exposure at one year
- Major adverse cardiovascular events [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Composite endpoint of adverse cardiovascular events, including:
All-cause mortality Non-fatal myocardial infarction Unstable angina requiring hospital admission Late revascularization procedures (>6 months after initial evaluation)
- Quality of life [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change of quality of life at 1 year
| Estimated Enrollment: | 1350 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2011 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | January 2016 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | January 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cardiac CT
Cardiac CT (CT calcium and/or CT angiography), followed by stress testing, invasive angiography or neither depending on the CT scan result
|
Other: Cardiac CT
Cardiac CT: calcium scan and CT coronary angiography
|
|
Standard care
Standard diagnostic management, including stress testing and/or invasive angiography
|
Other: Standard care
Standard care according to international guidelines
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men and women aged >18 years.
- Stable symptoms of chest pain or dyspnea potentially caused by obstructive CAD.
Exclusion Criteria:
- A history of surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization
- Non-revascularized angiographic obstructive coronary artery disease (>50% diameter reduction).
- Normal invasive coronary angiography or stress imaging less than 1 years ago.
- Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01393028
Contacts
| Contact: Koen Nieman, MD, PhD | +31 10 6 3333 4340 | k.nieman@erasmusmc.nl |
| Contact: Tjebbe W Galema, MD, PhD | +31 10 6 8126 8378 | t.w.galema@erasmusmc.nl |
Locations
| Netherlands | |
| MC Haaglanden | Not yet recruiting |
| Leidschendam, Netherlands | |
| Contact: Joop Schreur, MD jhmschreur@gmail.com | |
| Erasmus MC | Recruiting |
| Rotterdam, Netherlands | |
| Contact: Koen Nieman, MD, PhD +31 6 3333 4340 k.nieman@erasmusmc.nl | |
| Contact: Tjebbe Galema, MD, PhD +31 6 8126 8378 t.w.galema@erasmusmc.nl | |
| Havenziekenhuis | Not yet recruiting |
| Rotterdam, Netherlands | |
| Contact: Boudewijn J Krenning, MD, PhD b.krenning@havenziekenhuis.nl | |
| Maasstadziekenhuis | Not yet recruiting |
| Rotterdam, Netherlands | |
| Contact: Tobias Bruning, MD, PhD bruningt@maasstadziekenhuis.nl | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Erasmus Medical Center
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Koen Nieman, Erasmus MC |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01393028 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CRESCENT-11 |
| Study First Received: | June 27, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | July 12, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) |
Keywords provided by Erasmus Medical Center:
|
coronary artery disease angina pectoris Stable chest pain complaints |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Angina Pectoris Chest Pain Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Coronary Disease Heart Diseases |
Cardiovascular Diseases Vascular Diseases Pain Signs and Symptoms Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013