Utility of the History and Physical Exam in the Emergency Department
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The study is trying to prove that the history and physical exam (H&P) in the emergency department is the most important tool in exam of patients. The investigator is attempting to correlate the time of the H&P of residents and attendings to the accuracy of diagnosis.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Abdominal Pain Back Pain Dyspnea Headache Weakness |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | Utility of the History and Physical Exam in the Emergency Department |
| Enrollment: | 128 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2009 |
| Study Completion Date: | June 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | June 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
The purpose of the study is to examine the utility of the history and physical exam in the emergency room towards obtaining a diagnosis. The goal of this observational study is to correlate physician level of experience and time spent on history and physical exam, to the correct diagnosis.
The aim of this study is:
- To draw a connection between time and accuracy of the history and physical exam.
- To draw a connection between time and level of experience as a physician based on post-graduate level.
- To assess the number of laboratory and radiographic studies and the post-graduate level.
- To assess the relevance of the labs and radiographs ordered. (Relevance is defined as something that changes plan of care.)
Time is a critical component of the ED physician. Our study will analyse if modern medicine has created a more laboratory/image based need to ascertain a diagnosis or if history and physical examination alone can predict the ultimate diagnosis.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Emergency Department Patients
Inclusion Criteria:
- Anyone over the age of 18 with a generalized complaints able to provide consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Anyone under 18 yrs and anyone with a very specific, system based complaint.
Contacts and Locations| United States, Michigan | |
| Henry Ford Macomb Hospital | |
| Clinton Township, Michigan, United States, 48038 | |
| Study Director: | Jennifer Stevenson, DO | Henry Ford Macomb |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Peter Lunny, Henry Ford |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01154517 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 3617 |
| Study First Received: | June 30, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | June 30, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Abdominal Pain Asthenia Back Pain Dyspnea Emergencies Headache Pain Signs and Symptoms |
Signs and Symptoms, Digestive Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases Respiration Disorders Respiratory Tract Diseases Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013