Alleviated Positioning for Small Macular Holes
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Rational of the study: There are arguments to think that the closure of macular holes can be obtained without a strict positioning under certain conditions, i.e. hole size ≤ 400 µm, if the patient avoids the position laid down on the back. In order to be able to confirm these observations, it is necessary to make a randomized study with an adequate number of patients.
Aim of the study: To show that the percentage of success (anatomical closure confirmed by OCT) is not lower in the group without positioning.
Tested Hypothesis: The absence of strict positioning is "at least as effective" on the success of the surgery of small macular holes as the imposition of a strict positioning.
Expected results: To show that the success rate of the surgery of the idiopathic macular holes of 400 µm or less is not decreased by the replacement of a strict positioning (face-down 22h/24) by a simple instruction of avoiding the position laid down on the back, thus avoiding the patients this painful part of the treatment and allowing a reduction in the duration of hospitalization and consequently a reduction in the cost of the treatment.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Macular Hole |
Procedure: Macular hole surgery with alleviated positioning Procedure: Macular hole surgery with no alleviated positioning |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Evaluation of the Success Rate of a Procedure Without Strict Positioning Post Surgical Versus With Positioning Face Towards the Strict Ground, at Patients Presenting a Macular Hole. Study of Non-Inferiority. |
- Frequency of the successes defined by anatomical closure at third postoperative month. [ Time Frame: during the 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Gain of ETDRS visual acuity in the third postoperative month. [ Time Frame: during the 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Progression of cataract [ Time Frame: during the 7 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Frequency of the complications [ Time Frame: during the 7 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 69 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | June 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
Macular hole surgery with alleviated positioning
|
Procedure: Macular hole surgery with alleviated positioning
Macular hole surgery with alleviated positioning
Other Name: Macular hole surgery with alleviated positioning
|
|
No Intervention: 2
Macular hole surgery with no alleviated positioning
|
Procedure: Macular hole surgery with no alleviated positioning
Macular hole surgery with no alleviated positioning
Other Name: Macular hole surgery with no alleviated positioning
|
Detailed Description:
Rational of the study: There are arguments to think that the closure of macular holes can be obtained without a strict positioning under certain conditions, i.e. hole size ≤ 400 µm, if the patient avoids the position laid down on the back. In order to be able to confirm these observations, it is necessary to make a randomized study with an adequate number of patients.
Main Aim of the study: To show that the percentage of success (anatomical closure confirmed by OCT) is not lower in the group without positioning.
Tested Hypothesis: The absence of strict positioning is "at least as effective" on the success of the surgery of small macular holes as the imposition of a strict positioning.
Primary outcome: Frequency of the successes defined by anatomical closing.
Secondary objectives: To show the non inferiority of the technique without positioning by the following variables: - ETDRS visual acuity in the third postoperative month. - Progression of cataract - Frequency of the complications.
Design of the study: Randomized multicentric study, in parallel groups, open, with individual benefit for the patient.
Number of subjects and duration of the study: 68 patients, divided into two parallel groups, of more than 18 years, presenting a hole ≤ 400 µm, will be included and followed over a period of 3 months. The estimated total duration of the study is 27 months.
Data analysis: In the case of this equivalence clinical trial the margin of non inferiority was fixed at 15%. The secondary criteria will consequently be analyzed.
Expected results: To show that the success rate of the surgery of the idiopathic macular holes of 400 µm or less is not decreased by the replacement of a strict positioning (face-down 22h/24) by a simple instruction of avoiding the position laid down on the back, thus avoiding the patients this painful part of the treatment and allowing a reduction in the duration of hospitalization and consequently a reduction in the cost of the treatment.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Patient presenting an idiopathic macular hole of stage 2, 3 or 4
- Opening diameter of the macular hole ≤ 400 µm
- Patient having been informed of the objectives and constraints of the study and having signed an informed consent
- Patient not presenting a per-operational complication having required a complementary gesture or a modification of the usual procedure, with the only exception of discovering a retinal tear, flat, located between 10 and 2h and having required only a treatment by cryo.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient having a strong myopia of the eye operated (correction carried or optimal > 6 dioptres)
- Patient MONOPHTALMIA
- Patient presenting a non contact plan capsular CRYSTALLINE being able to leave a passage of gas towards the former segment
- Patient presenting an associated ocular pathology -
- Patient presenting a TM already operated of the eye to include (repetition or failure after a first surgery)
- Patient refusing to sign an assent
Contacts and Locations| France | |
| Service d'Ophtalmolgie de l'Hôpital Lariboisière | |
| Paris, France, 75010 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Ramin TADAYONI, MD | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Christophe AUCAN, Department Clinical Research of Developpement |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00190164 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | P031004, CRC03140 |
| Study First Received: | September 12, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | July 17, 2008 |
| Health Authority: | France: Ministry of Health |
Keywords provided by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris:
|
Macular hole Vitrectomy positioning retina surgery |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Retinal Perforations Retinal Diseases Eye Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013